Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hard m-term retention is optimal for an orthonormal coefficient basis

Statement

Let U∈RN×N satisfy UTU=UUT=IN, let x∈RN, and set c=Ux. For any S⊆{0,…,N−1} let PSc retain exactly the coordinates in S. Then ∥x−UTPSc∥22=∑i∉S∣ci∣2. Consequently, for every 0≤m≤N, Hm(c) from Hard m-term retention and soft thresholding of finite coefficients minimizes reconstruction error over all choices retaining at most m coefficients. Its squared error is exactly the sum of the discarded squared coefficients.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real orthogonal matrix U, a vector x∈RN, its coefficient vector c=Ux, and an integer 0≤m≤N.

[F1]

The Euclidean inner product ⟨x,y⟩=∑k<nxkyk on Rn: ∥z∥22=∑izi2 for a real coordinate vector.

[F2]

Hard m-term retention and soft thresholding of finite coefficients: hard m-term retention keeps a set of m largest absolute coefficients, with arbitrary tie resolution.

Proof

1.1givenF1algebra

Since UTU=IN, x=UTc. Orthogonality gives ∥x−UTPSc∥22=∥UT(c−PSc)∥22=∥c−PSc∥22=∑i∉S∣ci∣2. This proves the exact discarded-tail identity.

2.1givenF2step 1.1algebra∎

Minimizing the tail is equivalent to maximizing ∑i∈S∣ci∣2 among sets with at most m indices. A maximizing set can include no zero coefficient while omitting a nonzero one; and if it includes j while omitting i with ∣ci∣>∣cj∣, replacing j by i strictly increases that sum. Since the index set is finite, a maximizing set exists, and every set of m largest absolute coefficients is maximizing; when fewer than m coefficients are nonzero, adding zero coordinates changes no error. By [F2], Hm is one such set, proving optimality including ties and the endpoints m=0,N.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources