How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hard m-term retention is optimal for an orthonormal coefficient basis
Statement
Let satisfy , let , and set . For any let retain exactly the coordinates in . Then Consequently, for every , from Hard m-term retention and soft thresholding of finite coefficients minimizes reconstruction error over all choices retaining at most coefficients. Its squared error is exactly the sum of the discarded squared coefficients.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real orthogonal matrix , a vector , its coefficient vector , and an integer .
The Euclidean inner product on : for a real coordinate vector.
Hard m-term retention and soft thresholding of finite coefficients: hard m-term retention keeps a set of largest absolute coefficients, with arbitrary tie resolution.
Proof
Since , . Orthogonality gives This proves the exact discarded-tail identity.
Minimizing the tail is equivalent to maximizing among sets with at most indices. A maximizing set can include no zero coefficient while omitting a nonzero one; and if it includes while omitting with , replacing by strictly increases that sum. Since the index set is finite, a maximizing set exists, and every set of largest absolute coefficients is maximizing; when fewer than coefficients are nonzero, adding zero coordinates changes no error. By [F2], is one such set, proving optimality including ties and the endpoints .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Stéphane Mallat, A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, 3rd ed., Chapter 9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Gilbert Strang and Kevin Amaratunga, Wavelets and Filter Banks, MIT OpenCourseWare 18.327, Handout 15 (standard reference, not scraped)