How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A flat finite-type equivalence relation has a generic scheme quotient
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Let be a flat finite-type equivalence-relation groupoid on a separated finite-type -scheme. There is a dense saturated open whose fppf quotient is a finite-type scheme . The quotient is faithfully flat of finite presentation and .
Facts & Assumptions
Generic saturated quasi-sections with affine-contained finite subsets exist. (A flat finite-type equivalence relation has generic saturated quasi-sections)
A quasi-section whose arrow map is finite locally free and whose finite-relation orbits lie in affine opens gives a scheme fppf quotient, a faithfully flat finite-presentation projection, and the prescribed kernel pair. (A flat equivalence relation with a suitable quasi-section has a scheme quotient)
Proof
Given: The schemes, maps, and hypotheses in the statement, and AC.
Apply [F1] and write its dense open as the finite disjoint union of saturated opens , with quasi-sections . The induced relation has finite locally free projections, so every orbit is finite; [F1] puts it in an affine open of . Thus every hypothesis of [F2] holds on each , and it supplies a finite-type scheme representing , with the asserted projection and kernel pair.
Set . Since the are disjoint and saturated there are no relation arrows between different pieces, so this disjoint union represents the fppf quotient of . Flatness, finite presentation, surjectivity and the kernel-pair identity hold piecewise and hence globally. AC is inherited from [F1]–[F2].
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- SGA3, Expose V, Sections 7-8 (standard reference, not scraped)