How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Every finite orthogonal list of nonzero vectors is linearly independent
Statement
Every finite orthogonal list of nonzero vectors in an inner product space is linearly independent. The empty list is included.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An orthogonal list in an inner product space, with for every .
Orthogonality means whenever (Orthogonal vectors and subspaces, orthogonal and orthonormal sets, and orthonormal bases).
Positive definiteness gives for every nonzero (Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument).
A finite list is linearly independent when its only vanishing linear combination has every coefficient zero (Linear independence: a finite list is independent when forces every , and a subset is independent when every injective finite list into is independent).
Proof
If , the independence condition is vacuous. Suppose and .
For each , pair the equality in step 1.1 with . Linearity and [L1] give .
By [L2], , so . This holds for every , and [L3] proves independence.
Depends on
- Orthogonal vectors and subspaces, orthogonal and orthonormal sets, and orthonormal bases
- Linear independence: a finite list $v : n \to V$ is independent when $\sum_{i<n} \lambda_i v_i = 0_V$ forces every $\lambda_i = 0_F$, and a subset $S \subseteq V$ is independent when every injective finite list into $S$ is independent
- Real and complex inner product spaces, with the inner product linear in the first argument
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 49 results over 17 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Sheldon Axler, Linear Algebra Done Right, 4th ed., result 6.25 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sergei Treil, Linear Algebra Done Wrong, Theorem 5.2.6 (standard reference, not scraped)