How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An additive error ledger for inexact Parareal sweeps
Statement
Use the notation and Lipschitz hypotheses of A conditional binomial error bound for Parareal, with . Let computed iterates satisfy , , and, for each requested correction, for a constant . Define and a nonnegative forcing array by , , and Then for every completed node and sweep.
The base envelope includes coarse-initialization error relative to the fine trajectory. The per-update defect must bound the actual combined effect of fine/coarse evaluation errors and correction-solve error; a residual tolerance alone supplies no forward-error bound.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Parareal Lipschitz hypotheses, the stated computed recurrence defect, and the definitions of and .
A conditional binomial error bound for Parareal: with , the exact-arithmetic error is bounded by .
Every computed comparison point lies in the common set on which the two Lipschitz bounds hold, and the combined update defect has norm at most .
Proof
Set . Subtracting from the computed recurrence, splitting off the update defect, and applying the two Lipschitz inequalities gives .
At node , , for , and ; at , the base coarse-error assumption gives .
Assume at node for every completed sweep. For , step 1.1 gives . The terms satisfy because and Pascal's identity holds. The remaining terms equal by definition. Therefore the bound holds at node ; induction proves it for all nodes and sweeps.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Martin J. Gander, 50 Years of Time Parallel Time Integration (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ben S. Southworth, Necessary Conditions and Tight Two-Level Convergence Bounds for Parareal and Multigrid Reduction in Time (standard reference, not scraped)