How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
PDHG has an O(1/k) ergodic saddle-gap bound
Statement
Assume the hypotheses of Chambolle–Pock primal-dual hybrid gradient and that has a saddle point in the sense of Saddle points of extended-real Lagrangians. For define For every , , In particular, the saddle gap is nonnegative and obeys this bound with . On bounded test sets the displayed upper bound is . This is an ergodic gap statement; it is not a pointwise objective bound and does not assert pointwise iterate convergence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The exact PDHG recurrence, positive steps with , and a saddle point.
The exact recurrence, strict step condition, and a saddle point hold.
Chambolle–Pock primal-dual hybrid gradient: are proper closed convex and the iterates follow the exact recurrence.
PDHG one-step primal-dual gap telescope: for every test pair and , the sum of the first saddle differences is at most the initial weighted squared distance.
Saddle points of extended-real Lagrangians: for all .
Proof
Every exact proximal output lies in the effective domain of its function. Convexity therefore puts in and in .
By convexity in [F1], and ; linearity gives . Hence Apply [F2] and divide by to get the bound.
By the saddle inequalities [F3], and , so their difference is nonnegative. Step 2.1 at supplies the same upper bound. The ergodic estimate makes no claim about a single nonaveraged objective difference or pointwise iterate convergence.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Antonin Chambolle and Thomas Pock, A First-Order Primal-Dual Algorithm for Convex Problems with Applications to Imaging, Theorem 1(b), §3.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Laurent Vandenberghe, UCLA EE236C Lecture Notes: Douglas–Rachford Splitting, §§4–5 (standard reference, not scraped)