How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Floating local kernels and positive interior blocks
Statement
In the setting of Scalar finite-element substructuring model, the nullspace of the floating local energy matrix on a connected is exactly the one-dimensional space of constants. The principal stiffness block on interior nodal values with zero boundary trace is positive definite (including the empty -dimensional block convention). The assembled global Dirichlet stiffness matrix is positive definite.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A connected, face-matched triangulation of each , , and the nonempty global Dirichlet boundary from Scalar finite-element substructuring model.
Scalar finite-element substructuring model: ; local functions are continuous and affine on every triangle; each subdomain's triangle edge-adjacency graph is connected.
Scalar finite-element substructuring model: the global functions are continuous across every subdomain interface and vanish on a nonempty outer boundary segment.
Proof
If , each nonnegative term is zero. Since is constant on each triangle, it vanishes on every triangle, so is constant there. Continuity across every shared edge makes neighboring constants equal; connectedness of the triangle adjacency graph makes one constant on all of . Conversely, a constant has zero gradient, hence lies in the kernel. This proves the floating-block nullspace claim.
A vector in the interior block's kernel defines a local function with zero boundary trace and zero energy. Step 1.1 makes it constant and the zero boundary trace makes that constant zero. Thus the interior quadratic form is strictly positive on every nonzero vector, so its symmetric matrix is positive definite. If there are no interior vertices, the unique map on the zero vector space is invertible.
If the global energy vanishes, step 1.1 applied triangle by triangle gives one constant on every subdomain. Interface continuity makes adjacent subdomain constants equal; connectedness propagates one constant through . The nonempty Dirichlet segment forces it to be zero. Hence only the zero global vector has zero quadratic energy, proving positive definiteness.
Depends on
Used by
- Discrete harmonic extension and interface Schur complement Definition
- A floating component without a constant-detecting primal constraint remains singular Example
- Two floating Poisson subdomains and primal anchoring Example
- Discrete harmonic extension minimizes energy Theorem
- Primal constraints remove local floating kernels Theorem
- Static condensation is the exact interface problem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Olof B. Widlund, Introduction to the Design and Theory of Domain Decomposition Algorithms, DD20 Tutorial, pp. 35–37 and 83–84 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Oliver Rheinbach, Parallel Scalable Iterative Substructuring, Chapter 2, §§2.1–2.3 (standard reference, not scraped)