How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Peano's mixed-partial theorem from continuity of one mixed partial
Statement
Let have in a neighbourhood of , with continuous at , and let exist. Then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The hypotheses in the statement.
When and exist on a neighbourhood of a rectangle, its rectangular second difference is the product of the side lengths and a value of (A rectangular second difference equals a mixed partial times the side lengths).
Proof
For sufficiently small nonzero , apply [L1] to the rectangle with corners and . After division by , continuity of at makes the limit, as , equal to .
For fixed nonzero , first let in the same rectangle quotient; it becomes . Letting gives the defining quotient for .
The two limits are equal, proving .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 12 results over 7 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Mixed partial derivatives (Eremenko) (standard reference, not scraped)