Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

PID plus p greater than omega-one eliminates S-spaces

Statement

In ZFC plus PID and p>ω1, every regular Hausdorff hereditarily separable space is hereditarily Lindelöf. Consequently no S-space exists.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: PID, p>ω1, and a regular Hausdorff hereditarily separable space K.

[F1]

A P-ideal uses modulo-finite pseudounions; PID has the uncountable internally-small and countable orthogonal-cover alternatives; p controls pseudointersections; and S-spaces use the stated hereditary topological conventions. P-ideals, PID, the pseudointersection number, and S-spaces

[A1]

AC supplies the omega-one recursion, countable enumerations, and all simultaneous finite-modulo and topological witness choices. The Axiom of Choice

Proof

1.1F1A1Givenassume-contra

Assume for contradiction that some subspace W⊆K is not Lindelöf. Regularity, Hausdorffness, and hereditary separability pass to subspaces, so replace K by W. Choose an open cover with no countable subcover. Recursively for α<ω1, select a cover member Uα and xα∈Uα outside ⋃β<αUβ. Let X={xα:α<ω1} and relabel Uxα=Uα; then Ux∩X is countable for every x∈X. By regularity choose open Vx with x∈Vx⊆Vx‾⊆Ux. Define I={A∈[X]≤ω:(∀x∈X) ∣A∩Vx‾∣<ω}. It is an ideal containing all finite sets.

2.1F1A1step 1.1

We first derive the needed domination fact from p. If F⊆ωω has size less than p, consider, on the countable set ω<ω, the sets Af={s:(∀i<∣s∣) f(i)≤s(i)} for f∈F and Cn={s:∣s∣≥n}. Every finite intersection is infinite. A pseudointersection B exists by the definition of p; thin it to distinct sn with ∣sn∣>n, and put g(n)=sn(n). Since B⊆∗Af, g eventually dominates every f∈F. Now take An∈I, replace them by their increasing finite unions, and enumerate each infinite An as {an,k:k<ω}. For each x, choose fx(n) past the finite set An∩Vx‾. As ∣X∣=ω1<p, choose one eventual dominator g for all fx, and set A=⋃n{an,k:k≥g(n)}, ignoring finite An. Each An⊆∗A, while for fixed x all sufficiently large rows avoid Vx‾ and the finitely many remaining rows meet it finitely. Thus A∈I, proving that I is a P-ideal.

3.1F1A1step 2.1

Apply PID to I. In the first alternative take uncountable Y⊆X with [Y]≤ω⊆I. For y∈Y, the set Y∩Vy must be finite; otherwise a countably infinite subset of it would belong to I yet meet Vy‾ infinitely. Since the space is Hausdorff and hence T1, delete the finitely many other points of Y∩Vy to obtain a relative open neighborhood isolating y. Thus Y is an uncountable discrete subspace, which is not separable, contradicting hereditary separability.

3.2F1A1step 1.1step 2.1

In PID's second alternative write X=⋃nYn with every Yn⊥I. Some Y=Yn is uncountable, and hereditary separability gives a countable dense D⊆Y. The family {D∖Vx‾:x∈X} has the strong finite intersection property. Indeed, if D∖⋃x∈FVx‾ were finite for some finite F, then Y⊆D‾⊆⋃x∈FVx‾ together with finitely many points. But every Vx‾⊆Ux and each Ux∩X is countable, forcing Y countable, a contradiction. Since ∣X∣=ω1<p, F1 gives an infinite pseudointersection a⊆D. Then a∩Vx‾ is finite for every x, so a∈I; but a⊆Y contradicts Y⊥I. Thus the second alternative is impossible as well.

4.1F1A1step 3.1step 3.2discharge-contradiction: step 3.1step 3.2∎

Both PID alternatives contradict hereditary separability, so the assumed non-Lindelöf subspace W cannot exist. Hence every subspace of the original K is Lindelöf: K is hereditarily Lindelöf. By the S-space definition in F1, no regular Hausdorff hereditarily separable non-Lindelöf space exists. AC is used exactly as recorded in A1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources