How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pointing translates to
Statement
Let be a combinatorial class with ordinary generating function
Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A combinatorial class with counting sequence and ordinary generating function .
The formal derivative of is (The formal derivative ).
Proof
For each , every size- object of contributes exactly pointed objects of size , one for each distinguished position. Hence the size- layer of has cardinality .
Therefore , using [L1] for the last equality.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Philippe Flajolet and Robert Sedgewick, Analytic Combinatorics (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stephen Melczer, An Invitation to Enumeration, Chapter 5: Combinatorial Constructions (standard reference, not scraped)