Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A free product has the union presentation of presentations of its factors

Statement

Suppose each GiG_i has a presentation XiRi\langle X_i\mid R_i\rangle, with the alphabets replaced by disjoint copies. Then iGiiXi | iRi.\ast_iG_i\cong\left\langle\bigsqcup_iX_i\ \middle|\ \bigcup_iR_i\right\rangle.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects and hypotheses in the statement.

[L1]

Let F(X)F(X) be a free group and let RF(X)R\subseteq F(X) be a set of words, called relations. The group with presentation XR:=F(X)/ ⁣R ⁣F(X)\langle X\mid R\rangle:=F(X)/\langle\!\langle R\rangle\!\rangle_{F(X)} is the quotient by the normal closure of RR. The members of XX are its generators. In this quotient, every relation in RR becomes the identity, as do all consequences forced by normality. (Group presentation by generators and relations).

[L2]

Let XR\langle X\mid R\rangle be a presentation, let HH be a group, and let u:XHu:X\to H be a function. If the evaluation of every rRr\in R under uu is eHe_H, then there is a unique homomorphism u:XRH\overline u:\langle X\mid R\rangle\longrightarrow H with u([x])=u(x)\overline u([x])=u(x) for every xXx\in X. Moreover, u\overline u is surjective if and only if u(X)u(X) generates HH. (Von Dyck's theorem: maps of generators that satisfy the relators extend uniquely from a presented group).

[L3]

For a family (Gi)iI(G_i)_{i\in I}, a free product is a group FF with homomorphisms ιi:GiF\iota_i:G_i\to F in the sense of def-group-homomorphism, such that for every group HH and every family of homomorphisms fi:GiHf_i:G_i\to H, there is a unique homomorphism f:FHf:F\to H satisfying fιi=fif\circ\iota_i=f_i for all ii. It is denoted iIGi\ast_{i\in I}G_i. Injectivity of the maps ιi\iota_i is not part of this definition. (The free product of an arbitrary family of groups).

[L4]

Any two free products of the same family are connected by a unique isomorphism commuting with every canonical factor map. (Free products are unique up to a unique factor-compatible isomorphism).

[L5]

In a presentation XR\langle X\mid R\rangle as in def-group-presentation, an element rRF(X)r\in R\subseteq F(X) is called a defining relator. The equation r=1r=1 that it imposes in the quotient is a defining relation. More generally, an equation u=vu=v may be recorded by the relator u1vu^{-1}v. The published definition uses the common looser convention of calling the members of RR relations; both conventions define the same quotient group. A presentation is finitely generated when XX is finite, finitely related when RR is finite, and finite when both XX and RR are finite. A group is called finitely generated, finitely related, or finitely presented when it admits a presentation with the corresponding property. For finitely generated groups this agrees with generation by a finite subset in the sense of def-generated-subgroup. (Relators and relations; finitely generated, finitely related, and finite presentations).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A homomorphism from the displayed group to a target HH is determined by images of the union of the generators that kill every relator in every RiR_i.

givenL1L2L3L4L5
2.1

By von Dyck's theorem, this is equivalent to a family of homomorphisms GiHG_i\to H.

step 1.1
3.1

The displayed group therefore has the free-product universal property, so uniqueness of free products gives the isomorphism. Empty and singleton families give the trivial and original presentations.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 38 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources