How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projected-gradient fixed points are normal-cone certificates
Statement
Let , let (zero allowed), and take , , , and . Let be nonempty and let be convex and continuously differentiable with -Lipschitz gradient, . For , the projected-gradient mapping of Proximal-gradient mapping and projected-gradient mapping satisfies where has the outward convention of Scaled KKT residual and convex normal cone. If a feasible tuple satisfies , , and for every inequality, then is such a fixed point and is a global minimizer over . The converse to this KKT-multiplier implication is not asserted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The polyhedron, differentiable convex objective and, in the second claim, the feasible KKT tuple.
The proximal map of an indicator is Euclidean projection: equals the unique Euclidean projection .
Metric projection onto a closed convex set satisfies the variational inequality: if , then for all .
Convex KKT conditions certify a global minimum and an outward normal: when , for a differentiable convex objective on an open convex set, affine equalities and differentiable convex inequalities, a feasible KKT tuple with nonnegative inequality multipliers implies global minimality and .
The Euclidean inner product on : consists of its unique zero vector, and its inner product and norm vanish.
The displayed is closed and convex as the intersection of affine equality sets and affine closed half-spaces; it is nonempty by hypothesis.
Proof
If , then by [F5], and nonempty is . Its projection fixes , so ; also and . Thus the fixed-point/normal-cone equivalence holds.
Now assume . Fix and put . By [F1], . If , then , so [F2] gives for every . Since , this is exactly by [F3].
Conversely suppose and . Then for every . Expanding gives Thus is the nearest point in to ; uniqueness of projection gives , so .
If , nonempty , so every feasible is the global minimizer and is the projected-gradient fixed point by step 1.1. If , write the inequalities as on the open convex set ; these functions are affine, differentiable and convex. The feasible tuple meets the hypotheses of [F4], which gives global minimality and ; step 1.3 then gives the fixed point. No constraint qualification or multiplier converse is used.
Depends on
- Proximal-gradient mapping and projected-gradient mapping
- The proximal map of an indicator is Euclidean projection
- Metric projection onto a closed convex set satisfies the variational inequality
- Scaled KKT residual and convex normal cone
- Convex KKT conditions certify a global minimum and an outward normal
- The Euclidean inner product $\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k$ on $\mathbb{R}^n$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Amir Beck and Marc Teboulle, A Fast Iterative Shrinkage-Thresholding Algorithm for Linear Inverse Problems, Remark 2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Stephen Boyd and Lieven Vandenberghe, Convex Optimization, Chapter 5, §§5.1–5.2 (standard reference, not scraped)