Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-07
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Projective complexes model the bounded above derived category

Statement

With supplied bounded-above projective replacements pX:PXX (and DC or supplied homotopy lifts), the functor K(ProjA)D(A) is an equivalence of triangulated categories with a quasi-inverse determined by those data. In particular its Hom collections are sets whenever A is locally small.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: With supplied bounded-above projective replacements pX:PXX (and DC or supplied homotopy lifts), the functor K(ProjA)D(A) is an equivalence of triangulated categories with a quasi-inverse determined by those data. In particular its Hom collections are sets whenever A is locally small.

[F1]

A bounded-above projective complex is K-projective under DC or supplied lifts (A bounded above complex of projectives is homotopically projective).

[F2]

Hom out of a K-projective needs no roof (Morphisms from a homotopically projective complex need no roof).

[F3]

Enough projectives gives an objectwise bounded-above replacement under DC or supplied epimorphisms (Bounded above complexes admit projective replacements).

[F4]

Bounded derived localizations embed fully faithfully and exactly (Bounded derived localizations embed fully faithfully).

Proof

1.1

Every bounded-above projective complex is K-projective. The no-roof theorem and the fully faithful bounded embedding identify its Hom in K with Hom in D. This proves full faithfulness, including the zero complex.

F1F2F4
2.1

Enough projectives gives objectwise replacements under the stated choice hypothesis; here pX are supplied simultaneously. Put R(X)=PX. For u:XY in D, full faithfulness gives a unique homotopy class R(u):PXPY with Q(R(u))=Q(pY)1uQ(pX). Uniqueness gives identity and composition laws. The maps Q(pX) and their unique lifts provide the natural isomorphisms for a quasi-inverse.

F3step 1.1algebra
3.1

Finite sums of projectives are projective by lifting their component maps. Hence shifts and cones of maps of bounded-above projectives stay in the model. Its cone triangulation is the restricted one from K; the inclusion is exact. A triangle transported by R is isomorphic to a model cone triangle: lift its first arrow, take its cone, and use TR3 plus the two-isomorphism argument to compare completions. Thus the equivalence is exact. Its Hom sets are the ordinary homotopy-class quotients of sets of complex maps.

F4step 1.1step 2.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources