How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Projective complexes model the bounded above derived category
Statement
With supplied bounded-above projective replacements (and DC or supplied homotopy lifts), the functor is an equivalence of triangulated categories with a quasi-inverse determined by those data. In particular its Hom collections are sets whenever is locally small.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: With supplied bounded-above projective replacements (and DC or supplied homotopy lifts), the functor is an equivalence of triangulated categories with a quasi-inverse determined by those data. In particular its Hom collections are sets whenever is locally small.
A bounded-above projective complex is K-projective under DC or supplied lifts (A bounded above complex of projectives is homotopically projective).
Hom out of a K-projective needs no roof (Morphisms from a homotopically projective complex need no roof).
Enough projectives gives an objectwise bounded-above replacement under DC or supplied epimorphisms (Bounded above complexes admit projective replacements).
Bounded derived localizations embed fully faithfully and exactly (Bounded derived localizations embed fully faithfully).
Proof
Every bounded-above projective complex is K-projective. The no-roof theorem and the fully faithful bounded embedding identify its Hom in with Hom in . This proves full faithfulness, including the zero complex.
Enough projectives gives objectwise replacements under the stated choice hypothesis; here are supplied simultaneously. Put . For in , full faithfulness gives a unique homotopy class with . Uniqueness gives identity and composition laws. The maps and their unique lifts provide the natural isomorphisms for a quasi-inverse.
Finite sums of projectives are projective by lifting their component maps. Hence shifts and cones of maps of bounded-above projectives stay in the model. Its cone triangulation is the restricted one from ; the inclusion is exact. A triangle transported by is isomorphic to a model cone triangle: lift its first arrow, take its cone, and use TR3 plus the two-isomorphism argument to compare completions. Thus the equivalence is exact. Its Hom sets are the ordinary homotopy-class quotients of sets of complex maps.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- 13.19.3–13.19.8; W 10.4.8 for the equivalence (standard reference, not scraped)