Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Unknown-count search halts almost surely when a marked item exists

Statement

For t>0, the BBHT algorithm halts with probability 1 and returns an element of M; the probability it has not returned a marked item after r rounds tends to zero. For t=0, it never halts and never outputs an element.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The BBHT algorithm with fresh randomness and a fresh quantum register in every round.

[F1]

BBHT search when the marked count is unknown: each round directly tests a uniform candidate, then uses j uniformly distributed on {1,…,Mℓ}, measures, verifies with a bit query, and continues after failure.

[F2]

Finite marked-item search and its bit oracle: when t=0, the marked set M is empty; when t>0, a successful output is a verified element of M.

[F3]

Constant BBHT stage success beyond the threshold scale: for 0<a<3/4, every round with Mℓ≥4/a has conditional quantum-search success at least 3/8.

Proof

1.1givenF1F2

If t=0, then M=∅ by [F2]. Every directly sampled and every quantum-measured candidate is therefore unmarked, and [F1] verifies each before returning. Thus no round returns and the loop does not halt.

1.2givenF1F2algebra

Suppose t>0 and write a=t/N. If a≥3/4, the initial uniform sample in every round is marked with probability a≥3/4. Fresh independent samples imply failure through r rounds is at most (1/4)r, which tends to zero.

1.3givenF1F3algebra

If 0<a<3/4, the schedule Mℓ=⌈(3/2)ℓ⌉ tends to infinity, so some finite L satisfies ML≥4/a. From round L onward, conditional on reaching that round and on the direct sample having failed, [F3] gives quantum-search success at least 3/8; fresh random labels and registers make this conditional law independent of the direct sample. Thus a round succeeds with probability at least a+(1−a)(3/8)≥3/8. Fresh rounds then give failure through round r≥L at most (5/8)r−L+1.

2.1step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3F1F2algebra∎

The verification query returns the actual value f(x), so any returned address is marked by [F1]–[F2]. The bounds in steps 1.2 and 1.3 tend to zero; therefore the algorithm returns a marked element with probability 1 whenever t>0.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources