How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unknown-count search halts almost surely when a marked item exists
Statement
For , the BBHT algorithm halts with probability and returns an element of ; the probability it has not returned a marked item after rounds tends to zero. For , it never halts and never outputs an element.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The BBHT algorithm with fresh randomness and a fresh quantum register in every round.
BBHT search when the marked count is unknown: each round directly tests a uniform candidate, then uses uniformly distributed on , measures, verifies with a bit query, and continues after failure.
Finite marked-item search and its bit oracle: when , the marked set is empty; when , a successful output is a verified element of .
Constant BBHT stage success beyond the threshold scale: for , every round with has conditional quantum-search success at least .
Proof
If , then by [F2]. Every directly sampled and every quantum-measured candidate is therefore unmarked, and [F1] verifies each before returning. Thus no round returns and the loop does not halt.
Suppose and write . If , the initial uniform sample in every round is marked with probability . Fresh independent samples imply failure through rounds is at most , which tends to zero.
If , the schedule tends to infinity, so some finite satisfies . From round onward, conditional on reaching that round and on the direct sample having failed, [F3] gives quantum-search success at least ; fresh random labels and registers make this conditional law independent of the direct sample. Thus a round succeeds with probability at least . Fresh rounds then give failure through round at most .
The verification query returns the actual value , so any returned address is marked by [F1]–[F2]. The bounds in steps 1.2 and 1.3 tend to zero; therefore the algorithm returns a marked element with probability whenever .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gilles Brassard, Peter Høyer, Michele Mosca, and Alain Tapp, Quantum Amplitude Amplification and Estimation, §2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Ronald de Wolf, Quantum Computing: Lecture Notes, §7.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Andrew M. Childs, Lecture Notes on Quantum Algorithms, §19.1 (standard reference, not scraped)