How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
MA(aleph_0) and the implication from CH to MA
Statement
In ZFC, holds for every nonempty preorder, without ccc. Consequently CH implies MA, because under CH every infinite cardinal below the continuum is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: AC, a nonempty preorder, and a countable family of dense sets.
Martin's Axiom at a cardinal and Martin's Axiom fixes the desired filter and the strict continuum range.
Transfinite recursion constructs the descending sequence.
Proof
Enumerate the dense family as (repetitions allowed, and for an empty family choose any ). Choose recursively in . The upward closure is directed and upward closed, and it meets each . No chain condition was used. AC provides the enumeration and choices.
Under CH, . The only infinite cardinal strictly below the continuum is , so the MA scheme of F1 is exactly the instance proved in step 1.1.
Depends on
Used by
- Martin's Axiom implies CH False statement
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Karagila, Forcing & Symmetric Extensions, Exercise 7.2 and Theorem 1.14 (Rasiowa–Sikorski) (standard reference, not scraped)