How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The regular representation is faithful
Statement
Let be a finite group and let be a field. Then the regular representation of over is faithful.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A finite group and its regular representation on .
In the regular representation, for all (The trivial representation, the regular representation, and permutation representations from finite -sets).
A representation is faithful when the only group element acting as the identity linear map is the identity element of the group (Intertwiners, the spaces and , equivalent representations, and faithful representations).
Proof
Suppose acts as the identity in the regular representation. Applying that operator to the basis vector gives by [L1].
The basis vectors of are indexed by the elements of , so forces . By [L2], this is exactly faithfulness.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Peter Webb, A Course in Finite Group Representation Theory, Example 4.3.4 (standard reference, not scraped)