How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
One-dimensional and multidimensional ReLU region lower bounds
Statement
For a standard adjacent-layer ReLU network with one input dimension and hidden layers of widths , the maximum number of full-dimensional activation regions is exactly . For integers and widths , there exists a standard adjacent-layer ReLU network with at least full-dimensional activation regions.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The layer width conditions in the statement and the fold, region upper-bound, and hyperplane arrangement results below.
A width- ReLU block for maps each of its intervals bijectively onto (A width-n ReLU block makes n+1 full folds).
For input dimension and widths , the region count is at most the rank-sensitive sum in Rank-sensitive upper bound for ReLU linear regions.
hyperplanes in general position in dimension cut that space into regions when (Hyperplane arrangement upper count and general-position count).
Proof
Compose the width- blocks from [F1]. Each existing interval is divided into intervals, each mapped onto , so after all layers the number is .
For , each index in [F2]'s upper sum is or : the previous factors leave for every . Thus the sum factors as , so the count in step 1.1 is exact. For the multidimensional construction, in each of the first layers allocate units to each coordinate and implement an independent width- fold on that coordinate; set any remaining units constantly inactive. Each prior box is thereby subdivided into boxes, each mapped bijectively onto .
Take an arrangement of hyperplanes in general position in . It has chambers by [F3], and there are finitely many chambers. Choose one point in each chamber and set . With and , all points lie in the interior of . Translate and scale the arrangement by ; it remains in general position and each of its chambers now meets the interior of the image cube. Use these transformed hyperplanes as the last layer's preactivation zero sets. Each preceding folded box maps affinely and bijectively onto , so every last-layer chamber has a preimage in the interior of every such box. The earlier layers distinguish different boxes, and the last-layer patterns distinguish the chambers within each box. Multiplying the number of boxes from step 2.1 by proves the stated lower bound.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Serra, Tjandraatmadja, and Ramalingam, Bounding and Counting Linear Regions of Deep Neural Networks, Theorems 7 and 8, Appendices D and E (standard reference, not scraped)
- Matus Telgarsky, Deep learning theory lecture notes, Chapter 5 (standard reference, not scraped)