How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Representing objects are unique up to a unique isomorphism compatible with their universal elements
Statement
Let have universal elements and . There is a unique isomorphism satisfying .
If instead has universal elements and , there is a unique isomorphism satisfying .
Hence a representing object is unique up to the unique isomorphism compatible with the chosen universal elements, in either variance.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally small category and the two universal elements for the same covariant functor or presheaf appearing in the statement.
For a covariant universal element , every has a unique expression with ; for a presheaf universal element, every has a unique expression with (A representation is equivalently a universal element with a unique factorisation property).
A morphism is an isomorphism when it admits a two-sided inverse (Isomorphism, groupoid, and connected category).
Proof
In the covariant case, apply [L1] for to and for to , obtaining unique morphisms and with and .
In the presheaf case, [L1] applied to and gives unique and with and .
Functoriality gives ; uniqueness in [L1] for gives . Similarly, .
By [F1], is an isomorphism. Any compatible morphism satisfies and therefore equals by [L1], proving uniqueness even among all compatible morphisms.
Contravariant functoriality and the same uniqueness argument give and ; [F1] and uniqueness in [L1] then make the unique compatible isomorphism.
Depends on
Used by
- Two singleton sets give canonically isomorphic representations of the identity functor on Set Example
- A representable functor carries a weighted limit to the weighted limit of the composed diagram Theorem
- A weighted limit and a weighted colimit are unique up to a unique compatible isomorphism Theorem
- A weighted limit is an ordinary limit over the category of elements of the weight, and a weighted colimit an ordinary colimit over it Theorem
- Weighting by a representable evaluates the diagram Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, Corollary 2.3.2 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Justin Campbell, Harvard Math 55b tutorial notes, Corollary 1.2.1 (standard reference, not scraped)