Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-31
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The p-power triangle inequality for nonnegative functions when 0<p<1

Statement

Let 0<p<1 and let f,gLp(μ) be nonnegative. Then

f+gppfpp+gpp.

Equivalently,

(f+g)pdμfpdμ+gpdμ.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An exponent 0<p<1 and nonnegative functions f,gLp(μ).

[L1]

For 0<p<1 and nonnegative reals a,b one has (a+b)pap+bp (The Lp distance for 0<p<1 is a complete translation-invariant metric).

Proof

Proof technique: For nonnegative numbers a,b and 0<p<1 one has (a+b)pap+bp. Apply this pointwise to f and g and integrate.

1.1

The scalar inequality [L1] applied pointwise gives [L1, given] (f+g)pfp+gp.

2.1

Integrating and using monotonicity and additivity from [L2] yields [step 1.1, L2] (f+g)pdμfpdμ+gpdμ. This is exactly the displayed pp inequality. ∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources