How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Primal-dual residual gap bound for a simplex candidate
Statement
For a real standard-form problem with and candidate vectors , , define , , and . When the data and candidates are finite stored binary floating-point values, Exact residual audit of finite-precision simplex candidates computes precisely these quantities, interpreting the stored values as exact dyadic rationals. For all the stated real data, and consequently Here and , with both norms equal to zero on the empty vector. This bounds the primal-dual objective difference; when either vector is infeasible it does not bound distance to an optimal value. If , , , and , then is optimal.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A real standard-form problem, dimension-matched real vectors , and the residuals and gap defined in the Statement.
Revised simplex standard-form linear program: Its feasible set is , and a feasible is optimal if for every .
Exact residual audit of finite-precision simplex candidates: For dimension-matched finite stored binary data and candidates, exact integer/rational arithmetic computes , , and . The status verified-optimal-for-stored-data is returned exactly when , , , and .
Proof
Expanding the right-hand side and cancelling the two equal scalar products gives .
The triangle inequality and give . The same calculation holds for empty vectors with the stated zero norms.
If is primal feasible and has , then every feasible satisfies . The stated makes , so attains this lower bound and is optimal. In particular, every verified-optimal-for-stored-data output of the audit certifies optimality for its stored data, because its exact tests are these hypotheses.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · one level
2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- David Bindel, CS 6210: Sums, Dots, and Error in Linear Systems, residual-based bounds (standard reference, not scraped)
- Dimitris Bertsimas and John N. Tsitsiklis, Introduction to Linear Optimization, §§3.1 and 4.3 (standard reference, not scraped)