Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Primal-dual residual gap bound for a simplex candidate

Statement

For a real standard-form problem with A∈Rm×n and candidate vectors x∈Rn, y∈Rm, define rp=Ax−b, rd=c−ATy, and g=cTx−bTy. When the data and candidates are finite stored binary floating-point values, Exact residual audit of finite-precision simplex candidates computes precisely these quantities, interpreting the stored values as exact dyadic rationals. For all the stated real data, g=xTrd+yTrp, and consequently ∣g∣≤∥x∥1∥rd∥∞+∥y∥1∥rp∥∞. Here ∥z∥1=∑i∣zi∣ and ∥z∥∞=max⁡i∣zi∣, with both norms equal to zero on the empty vector. This bounds the primal-dual objective difference; when either vector is infeasible it does not bound distance to an optimal value. If Ax=b, x≥0, c−ATy≥0, and g=0, then x is optimal.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real standard-form problem, dimension-matched real vectors x,y, and the residuals and gap defined in the Statement.

[F1]

Revised simplex standard-form linear program: Its feasible set is P(A,b)={x∈Rn:Ax=b, xj≥0 for every j}, and a feasible x is optimal if cTx≤cTz for every z∈P(A,b).

[F2]

Exact residual audit of finite-precision simplex candidates: For dimension-matched finite stored binary data and candidates, exact integer/rational arithmetic computes rp=Ax^−b, rd=c−ATy^, and g=cTx^−bTy^. The status verified-optimal-for-stored-data is returned exactly when x^≥0, rp=0, rd≥0, and g=0.

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

Expanding the right-hand side and cancelling the two equal scalar products gives xT(c−ATy)+yT(Ax−b)=cTx−bTy=g.

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The triangle inequality and ∣xTrd∣≤∑i∣xi∣∥rd∥∞ give ∣g∣≤∥x∥1∥rd∥∞+∥y∥1∥rp∥∞. The same calculation holds for empty vectors with the stated zero norms.

3.1F1F2givenstep 1.1algebra∎

If x is primal feasible and y has ATy≤c, then every feasible z satisfies cTz≥yTAz=yTb. The stated g=0 makes cTx=yTb, so x attains this lower bound and is optimal. In particular, every verified-optimal-for-stored-data output of the audit certifies optimality for its stored data, because its exact tests are these hypotheses.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

2 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources