Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Ricci equation for the normal connection

Statement

Assume ACω. Let R be the curvature of the normal connection. For tangent fields X,Y and normal fields ν,μ along an embedded Riemannian submanifold,

g(R(X,Y)ν,μ)=g(R(X,Y)ν,μ)g([Sν,Sμ]X,Y),

where [Sν,Sμ]=SνSμSμSν. Both curvatures use the bracket-corrected sign convention, and the choice hypothesis is inherited exactly through the smooth normal-bundle projections.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, an embedded Riemannian submanifold, tangent fields X,Y, and normal fields ν,μ.

[F1]

The Weingarten decomposition is Xν=SνX+Xν, and shape operators are self-adjoint with g(SμU,V)=g(II(U,V),μ). Weingarten equation and adjointness of the shape operator.

[F2]

The projected operation is a connection on νM. Normal connection.

[F3]

The shape operator is pointwise and linear in its normal direction. Shape operator.

[F4]

The curvature of a vector-bundle connection is R(X,Y)=XYYX[X,Y]. Curvature of a vector-bundle connection.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [F1] first to Yν=SνY+Yν. The normal component after differentiating in direction X is (XYν)=II(X,SνY)+XYν. The analogous formula holds with X,Y interchanged, and ([X,Y]ν)=[X,Y]ν.

F1F2algebra
2.1

Form the bracket-corrected ambient curvature and take its normal component. By [F4], the three normal-connection terms combine to R(X,Y)ν, leaving (R(X,Y)ν)=R(X,Y)νII(X,SνY)+II(Y,SνX).

F4step 1.1algebra
3.1

Pair step 2.1 with μ and use [F1]: the two correction terms become g(SμX,SνY)+g(SμY,SνX). Self-adjointness rewrites their sum as g(SνSμX,Y)+g(SμSνX,Y)=g([Sν,Sμ]X,Y), which proves the stated equation.

F1F3step 2.1algebra
4.1

The equation is vacuous on the empty submanifold. If tangent or normal rank is zero every term vanishes; in tangent rank one the curvature pair and the commutator vanish. The same calculation applies for a normal line bundle and at boundary points. Positive definiteness supplies the orthogonal splitting and self-adjointness. The stated ACω is inherited through [F1]–[F3], and no new selection occurs.

F1F2F3F4step 1.1step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources