How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Over every extension field, a scalar is an eigenvalue of the extended matrix exactly when it is a root of the minimal polynomial
Statement
Let , let be a field extension, and let . Then is an eigenvalue of the matrix acting on if and only if
where is the minimal polynomial over . For , both sets are empty.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A field extension , a matrix , and .
Extending the scalar field does not change the minimal polynomial of (For a matrix over a field, extending the scalar field does not change its minimal polynomial).
The minimal polynomial divides the characteristic polynomial (The minimal polynomial divides the characteristic polynomial, ).
Over any field, a scalar is an eigenvalue exactly when it is a root of the characteristic polynomial (For every finite-dimensional space, is exactly the set of roots in of ).
Polynomial evaluation is (Polynomial evaluation at an endomorphism: ).
Proof
Suppose for some nonzero . Induction gives , so [L4] gives for every . Taking and using [L1] yields , hence .
Conversely, if , then [L2] gives . The determinant formula for is unchanged after embedding in , so [L3] applied over says is an eigenvalue of on .
When , by [L1], so it has no roots, while the zero space has no nonzero eigenvector.
Depends on
- The minimal polynomial divides the characteristic polynomial, $\mu_T\mid\chi_T$
- For a matrix over a field, extending the scalar field does not change its minimal polynomial
- For every finite-dimensional space, $\sigma_F(T)$ is exactly the set of roots in $F$ of $\chi_T$
- Polynomial evaluation at an endomorphism: $p(T)=\sum_k a_kT^k$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 53 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Keith Conrad, The Minimal Polynomial and Some Applications, Theorem 4.7 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Keith Conrad, Potential Diagonalizability, Theorem 4(1) (standard reference, not scraped)