Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure

Statement

The Schubert strata are open cells whose closures are unions of cells with componentwise smaller pivot symbols. They form a finite CW structure on Grn(FN), and the standard inclusions Grn(FN)Grn(FN+1) are cellular subcomplex inclusions. Their union is the stated CW structure on Grn(F), and each finite-dimensional subcomplex is contained in a finite stage.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: F=R or C, 0nN, and the coordinate flag.

[F1]

A Schubert symbol a has a cell e(a)Fd(a) with d(a)=i(aii) (Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians).

[F2]

A CW structure requires characteristic disks, closure finiteness, and the weak topology (CW complex with closure finiteness and weak topology).

Proof

technique · induction
1.1

For a symbol a, replace the normalized echelon rows by the unique orthonormal echelon frame (v1,,vn) whose last nonzero coordinate is ai and is nonnegative real. Thus vi lies in a closed hemisphere Hi of dimension ai1 over R or 2ai2 over C. The space D(a) of these mutually orthogonal frames is a closed ball of real dimension d(a) or 2d(a): project to v1H1, rotate v1 to ea1 while fixing its orthogonal complement, identify the fiber with the analogous construction for (a21,,an1), and induct on n. For n=0 it is a point.

F1construct
2.1

The span map χa:D(a)Grn(FN) restricts on the interior, where every last pivot coordinate is positive, to the pivot-coordinate homeomorphism onto e(a) from [F1]. On the boundary at least one last pivot coordinate is zero; echelon reduction then lowers at least one pivot and never increases another. Hence χa(D(a)) lies in the union of cells e(b) with biai for all i and ba, all of smaller dimension.

F1step 1.1
3.1

Induct on the real cell dimension. The zero-dimensional cells form a finite discrete CW complex. If the union Xr of cells of dimension at most r has the asserted CW structure, attach the finitely many disks D(a) of dimension r+1 by the boundary maps in step 2.1. The resulting finite CW complex maps continuously and bijectively to the union Xr+1. Its source is compact, while the Grassmannian is Hausdorff because distinct planes are separated by a squared projection-length function; therefore the map is a homeomorphism. This completes the dimension induction and proves the finite CW structure and closure order.

F2step 2.1construct
4.1

Under the coordinate inclusion FNFN+1, the cells with anN retain the same symbols and characteristic disks, so they form a subcomplex. The stable Grassmannian has the weak topology with respect to these stages; hence [F2] identifies their union as the asserted CW complex. If a subcomplex has dimension at most r, then [F1] gives aiid(a)r, hence aii+r for every symbol it uses. Only finitely many such symbols exist and all have ann+r, so the subcomplex lies in the finite stage Grn(Fn+r).

F1F2step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources