How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure
Statement
The Schubert strata are open cells whose closures are unions of cells with componentwise smaller pivot symbols. They form a finite CW structure on , and the standard inclusions are cellular subcomplex inclusions. Their union is the stated CW structure on , and each finite-dimensional subcomplex is contained in a finite stage.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: or , , and the coordinate flag.
A Schubert symbol has a cell with (Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians).
A CW structure requires characteristic disks, closure finiteness, and the weak topology (CW complex with closure finiteness and weak topology).
Proof
For a symbol , replace the normalized echelon rows by the unique orthonormal echelon frame whose last nonzero coordinate is and is nonnegative real. Thus lies in a closed hemisphere of dimension over or over . The space of these mutually orthogonal frames is a closed ball of real dimension or : project to , rotate to while fixing its orthogonal complement, identify the fiber with the analogous construction for , and induct on . For it is a point.
The span map restricts on the interior, where every last pivot coordinate is positive, to the pivot-coordinate homeomorphism onto from [F1]. On the boundary at least one last pivot coordinate is zero; echelon reduction then lowers at least one pivot and never increases another. Hence lies in the union of cells with for all and , all of smaller dimension.
Induct on the real cell dimension. The zero-dimensional cells form a finite discrete CW complex. If the union of cells of dimension at most has the asserted CW structure, attach the finitely many disks of dimension by the boundary maps in step 2.1. The resulting finite CW complex maps continuously and bijectively to the union . Its source is compact, while the Grassmannian is Hausdorff because distinct planes are separated by a squared projection-length function; therefore the map is a homeomorphism. This completes the dimension induction and proves the finite CW structure and closure order.
Under the coordinate inclusion , the cells with retain the same symbols and characteristic disks, so they form a subcomplex. The stable Grassmannian has the weak topology with respect to these stages; hence [F2] identifies their union as the asserted CW complex. If a subcomplex has dimension at most , then [F1] gives , hence for every symbol it uses. Only finitely many such symbols exist and all have , so the subcomplex lies in the finite stage .
Depends on
Used by
- The tautological line over RP∞ has no finite-rank complement Counterexample
- The complex K-ring of CPⁿ Example
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory, Proposition 1.17 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Milnor and Stasheff, Characteristic Classes, §6 (standard reference, not scraped)