How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Schubert cells give the stable Grassmannian CW structure
Statement
The Schubert strata are open cells whose closures are unions of cells with componentwise smaller pivot symbols. They form a finite CW structure on , and the standard inclusions are cellular subcomplex inclusions. Their union is the stated CW structure on , and each finite-dimensional subcomplex is contained in a finite stage.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: or , , and the coordinate flag.
A Schubert symbol has a cell with (Schubert cells in real and complex Grassmannians).
A CW structure requires characteristic disks, closure finiteness, and the weak topology (CW complex with closure finiteness and weak topology).
Proof
For a symbol , each plane of has a unique orthonormal echelon frame with and positive real th coordinate: orthonormalize its flag of subspaces of dimensions . Let instead be the closed hemisphere of unit vectors in whose th coordinate is real and nonnegative, and let consist of all mutually orthogonal frames with , allowing zero pivot coordinates. Project to and put . There is a continuous family of orthogonal (real case) or unitary (complex case) maps carrying to , equal to the identity outside their span and at : use the plane rotation in the real case and the determinant-one unitary map on their complex two-plane in the complex case. The nonnegative real coordinate ensures , and these maps tend to the identity as . In particular they fix the common perpendicular of and , rather than alone. They act only in , so preserve and its boundary for . Applying to the remaining vectors trivializes the projection, with fiber after deleting coordinate . Induction, starting with , identifies with a product of closed balls, hence a closed ball of real dimension or . Its boundary is exactly where at least one pivot coordinate is zero.
The span map restricts on the interior, where every last pivot coordinate is positive, to the pivot-coordinate homeomorphism onto from [F1]. On the boundary at least one last pivot coordinate is zero; echelon reduction then lowers at least one pivot and never increases another. Hence lies in the union of cells with for all and , all of smaller dimension.
Induct on the real cell dimension. The zero-dimensional cells form a finite discrete CW complex. If the union of cells of dimension at most has the asserted CW structure, attach the finitely many disks of dimension by the boundary maps in step 2.1. The resulting finite CW complex maps continuously and bijectively to the union . Its source is compact, while the Grassmannian is Hausdorff because distinct planes are separated by a squared projection-length function; therefore the map is a homeomorphism. This completes the dimension induction and proves the finite CW structure and closure order.
Under the coordinate inclusion , the cells with retain the same symbols and characteristic disks, so they form a subcomplex. The stable Grassmannian has the weak topology with respect to these stages; hence [F2] identifies their union as the asserted CW complex. If a subcomplex has dimension at most , then [F1] gives , hence for every symbol it uses. Only finitely many such symbols exist and all have , so the subcomplex lies in the finite stage .
Depends on
Used by
- The Euler characteristic does not determine the signature Counterexample
- The tautological line over RP∞ has no finite-rank complement Counterexample
- Characteristic class as a universal natural bundle class Definition
- Chern character of a complex vector bundle Definition
- The Thom prespectrum of the universal real and oriented bundles Definition
- A point and projective-line check of source-first convolution and opposite composition Example
- Chern classes of a sum of universal complex lines Example
- Complex K-AHSS for complex projective space Example
- Euler class of the universal oriented two-plane Example
- Stiefel–Whitney class of the universal real line Example
- The complex K-ring of CPⁿ Example
- The complex projective plane has nonzero w2 and no Spin structure Example
- Unequal-dimensional proper pushforwards carry the summed-dimension Ext/Borel–Moore degree Example
- Cohomology ring of infinite complex projective space Lemma
- Every bordism class is realized by an embedded collapse Lemma
- Finite type and odd-primary acyclicity of K(F₂,q) Lemma
- First Chern form agrees with the topological line class Lemma
- Infinite real projective space is a marked mod-two Eilenberg–Mac Lane space Lemma
- Integral cohomology ring of complex projective space Lemma
- Oriented Grassmannians have two lifted Schubert cells Lemma
- Oriented real two-plane splitting with real-cohomology injection Lemma
- The complex tautological Euler class restricts to the projective-fiber generator Lemma
- The tangent bundle of complex projective space and its Pontryagin classes Lemma
- The universal complex flag bundle is BT-n Lemma
- The universal oriented sphere-bundle total space has the homotopy type of BSO(n-1) Lemma
- Universal real Thom spaces are (r−1)-connected Lemma
- Products of complex projective spaces span rational oriented bordism Proposition
- Integral finite generation of universal real and oriented Thom homology Theorem
- Mod-two cohomology of BO(n) Theorem
- Rational cohomology of BO and BSO by Pontryagin and Euler classes Theorem
- Relative-position incidence strata give a faithful geometric PBW basis Theorem
- The universal Pontryagin-Thom correspondence for unoriented and oriented bordism Theorem
- Thom identity for Stiefel–Whitney classes Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
4 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hatcher, Vector Bundles & K-Theory, Proposition 1.17 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Milnor and Stasheff, Characteristic Classes, §6 (standard reference, not scraped)