Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Second Whitehead lemma

Statement

If g is finite-dimensional semisimple over a characteristic-zero field and M is a finite-dimensional g-module, then H2(g,M)=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Such g and M.

[L1]

Weyl decomposes M as a finite direct sum of simple modules (Weyl's complete reducibility theorem).

[L2]

The Casimir is central and acts as an intertwiner (The Casimir operator is basis-independent and intertwining).

[L3]

H2 classifies abelian extensions, including the split zero class (Second cohomology classifies abelian extensions).

[L4]

Every ideal of a semisimple algebra has a complementary ideal (Ideals and quotients of semisimple Lie algebras).

[L5]

The trace-form version of Cartan's criterion makes an algebra solvable when the required pairings vanish (Cartan's solvability criterion).

[L6]

The radical of an invariant trace form is an ideal (Orthogonal complements under invariant forms are ideals).

[L7]

A nondegenerate invariant form and trace-dual bases define the Casimir operator (Casimir operator relative to an invariant form).

Proof

technique · Casimir homotopy plus central-extension splitting
1.1

Let S be a simple module with nontrivial action, put k=kerρ, and use [L4] to choose a complementary ideal h in g. The two ideals commute, ρh is faithful, and h is nonzero semisimple. The radical of its trace form on S is an ideal by [L6]; its restricted trace form meets the hypothesis of [L5], so that radical is solvable and hence zero. Thus the trace form on h is nondegenerate and defines the dual-basis Casimir operator C of [L7]. By [L2], C intertwines the simple module. Its trace is dimh0, so C is nonzero and therefore invertible by the kernel-image argument for an endomorphism of a simple module.

L2L4L5L6L7algebra
1.2

It remains to treat the trivial simple module k. By [L3], take a central extension 0keπg0. For xg, choose a lift x~ and define xy=[x~,y] on e. Centrality makes this independent of the lift, Jacobi makes it a representation, and π is a g-map for the adjoint action on g. By [L1], the surjection has a module section σ. Taking x~=σ(x), equivariance gives [σ(x),σ(y)]=σ([x,y]), so σ is a Lie section. The extension splits and [L3] gives H2(g,k)=0.

L1L3algebra
2.1

For the trace-dual bases (ei) and (ei) from [L7] in the ideal h, define H=iρ(ei)ιei on the CE cochains of g. The inverse tensor ieiei is invariant under h; it is also invariant under k because the complementary ideals commute. Expanding the CE differential therefore gives dH+Hd=C: the value-action terms give iρ(ei)ρ(ei) and the argument-action terms cancel in pairs by this invariance. Hence C acts null-homotopically in positive degrees. Since C is invertible by step 1.1 and commutes with d, composing H with C1 contracts every positive-degree cocycle. In particular H2(g,S)=0.

L2L7step 1.1algebra
3.1

The CE complex commutes with finite direct sums in the coefficient module. Decompose M by [L1]; steps 2.1 and 1.2 make the second cohomology of every simple summand zero, hence H2(g,M)=0. The zero module and zero algebra are included: for g=0, Λ2g=0. No choice principle is used beyond finite-dimensional basis choices.

L1step 2.1step 1.2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources