How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Second Whitehead lemma
Statement
If is finite-dimensional semisimple over a characteristic-zero field and is a finite-dimensional -module, then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Such and .
Weyl decomposes as a finite direct sum of simple modules (Weyl's complete reducibility theorem).
The Casimir is central and acts as an intertwiner (The Casimir operator is basis-independent and intertwining).
classifies abelian extensions, including the split zero class (Second cohomology classifies abelian extensions).
Every ideal of a semisimple algebra has a complementary ideal (Ideals and quotients of semisimple Lie algebras).
The trace-form version of Cartan's criterion makes an algebra solvable when the required pairings vanish (Cartan's solvability criterion).
The radical of an invariant trace form is an ideal (Orthogonal complements under invariant forms are ideals).
A nondegenerate invariant form and trace-dual bases define the Casimir operator (Casimir operator relative to an invariant form).
Proof
Let be a simple module with nontrivial action, put , and use [L4] to choose a complementary ideal in . The two ideals commute, is faithful, and is nonzero semisimple. The radical of its trace form on is an ideal by [L6]; its restricted trace form meets the hypothesis of [L5], so that radical is solvable and hence zero. Thus the trace form on is nondegenerate and defines the dual-basis Casimir operator of [L7]. By [L2], intertwines the simple module. Its trace is , so is nonzero and therefore invertible by the kernel-image argument for an endomorphism of a simple module.
It remains to treat the trivial simple module . By [L3], take a central extension . For , choose a lift and define on . Centrality makes this independent of the lift, Jacobi makes it a representation, and is a -map for the adjoint action on . By [L1], the surjection has a module section . Taking , equivariance gives , so is a Lie section. The extension splits and [L3] gives .
For the trace-dual bases and from [L7] in the ideal , define on the CE cochains of . The inverse tensor is invariant under ; it is also invariant under because the complementary ideals commute. Expanding the CE differential therefore gives : the value-action terms give and the argument-action terms cancel in pairs by this invariance. Hence acts null-homotopically in positive degrees. Since is invertible by step 1.1 and commutes with , composing with contracts every positive-degree cocycle. In particular .
The CE complex commutes with finite direct sums in the coefficient module. Decompose by [L1]; steps 2.1 and 1.2 make the second cohomology of every simple summand zero, hence . The zero module and zero algebra are included: for , . No choice principle is used beyond finite-dimensional basis choices.
Depends on
- Casimir operator relative to an invariant form
- The Casimir operator is basis-independent and intertwining
- Weyl's complete reducibility theorem
- Second cohomology classifies abelian extensions
- Ideals and quotients of semisimple Lie algebras
- Cartan's solvability criterion
- Orthogonal complements under invariant forms are ideals
Used by
- Levi decomposition theorem Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
29 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weibel, Lie Algebra Homology and Cohomology, Theorem 7.8.9 and Corollary 7.8.12 (standard reference, not scraped)