Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedverified 2026-09-26 (gpt-6-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Shapiro lemma for group cohomology

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice).

For H≤G, a left H-module M, and n≥0, there is a natural isomorphism Hn(G;Coind⁡HGM)≅Hn(H;M).

Proof

Given: The Axiom of Choice and a projective Z[G]-resolution P→Z.

1.1givenconstruct

Apply the Axiom of Choice to the family of nonempty right cosets H\G to obtain a transversal T. The group-ring freeness supplier then gives Z[G]≅⨁t∈TZ[H]t as left Z[H]-modules. Restriction therefore takes the projective left Z[G]-resolution P to a projective left Z[H]-resolution.

2.1step 1.1∎

Coinduction--restriction adjunction identifies Hom⁡G(P,Coind⁡M) with Hom⁡H(Res⁡P,M) as cochain complexes. Taking cohomology gives the claimed natural isomorphism.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

13 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources