How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sharp nine lemma
Statement
In a commutative diagram, assume the three columns and the last two rows are exact at their first two nodes. Then the first row is exact at its first two nodes.
If, in addition, the first column and the middle row are short exact, then the first row is short exact.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The commutative diagram in the statement.
In a short exact sequence, the left map is monic, the right map is epic, and the middle node is exact (Degenerate exactness criteria).
Monicity and epicity are equivalent to member cancellation and member lifting (Monicity by member cancellation, Epimorphy is detected by members).
Exactness at a node is equivalent to the member-lifting condition (Exactness is detected by members).
The common-refinement construction for member equivalence puts finitely many witness equalities on one epic domain, where hom-set subtraction is defined (Equivalence of members, Member equivalence is transitive, Abelian category).
Proof
Write the horizontal maps of the three rows as , , and , and the vertical maps of the three columns as from top to middle and from middle to bottom. Assume the three columns and the last two rows are exact at their first two nodes. Let and be members of with the same image in . Commutativity gives the same image of and in . Because the middle row is exact at its first node, is monic by [L1], so [L2] gives . Because the first column is exact at its first node, is monic, and another use of [L2] yields . Thus the top row is exact at .
Let be a member of with image in . Commutativity gives that maps to in . Exactness of the middle row at therefore yields a member of with by [L3]. Applying the right map of the first column gives Because the bottom row is exact at its first node, is monic by [L1], so [L2] shows . Exactness of the first column at now gives a member of with by [L3]. Then Since the second column is exact at its first node, is monic, so [L2] gives . Thus the top row is exact at .
Assume in addition that the first column and the middle row are short exact. By steps 1.1 and 1.2, the top row is already exact at its first two nodes, so only epicity of remains. Let be a member of . Because the middle row is short exact, is epic by [L1], so [L2] gives a member of with . Then so exactness of the bottom row at gives a member of with by [L3]. Since the first column is short exact, is epic by [L1], so [L2] gives a member of with . Now By [L4], pass to one common epic refinement of all the preceding equivalences and define . Then , , and on that domain. Exactness of the second column at gives a member of with by [L3]. Therefore Because the third column is exact at its first node, is monic, so [L2] gives . Hence is epic, and the top row is short exact.
Hence the sharp nine lemma is the left-exact half together with the precise extra hypotheses needed to upgrade it to a short exact row.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Saunders Mac Lane, Homology, Chapter XII, Section 3 (standard reference, not scraped)