How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Simple functions are dense in in the essential-supremum norm
Statement
Let be a measure space. Simple functions are dense in for the essential-supremum norm.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measure space, , and .
Choose a representative of the class and interpret its norm by the least essential bound (The space of essentially bounded measurable functions, The essential supremum is attained as the least essential bound).
Proof
Choose a measurable representative of and let . [L1, given, choose, construct] By [L1], almost everywhere. Partition the interval into finitely many subintervals of length at most , and on each strip choose one value . The resulting function
is simple.
On the full-measure set where , the values and lie [step 1.1, algebra] in the same interval , so . Hence
Since was arbitrary, simple functions are dense in [step 2.1] for the essential-supremum norm.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Measure Theory (standard reference, not scraped)