How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Two simple transcendental extensions are uniquely -isomorphic once their generators are matched
Statement
Let and be transcendental over . There is a unique -isomorphism such that .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Transcendental elements and over the same field .
Every element of has the form with and , and likewise for (A simple transcendental extension consists exactly of rational expressions in its generator).
An element is transcendental over when no nonzero polynomial in vanishes at it (Algebraic and transcendental elements and algebraic extensions).
Proof
Define . The denominators are nonzero by [A1].
If , cross-multiplication gives ; [A1] gives , and evaluation at proves that the two proposed images agree. Thus is well-defined.
The formula preserves sums and products, fixes , and sends to .
The same construction with and interchanged is inverse to , so is an -isomorphism.
Any -homomorphism sending to must send to ; [F1] therefore forces it to equal .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 13 results over 6 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. S. Milne, Fields and Galois Theory (standard reference, not scraped)