How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Slices of a locally cartesian closed category are locally cartesian closed
Statement
If is locally cartesian closed, then for every object the slice category is locally cartesian closed.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A locally cartesian closed category , an object , and an object of the slice category .
Local cartesian closedness means that every slice is cartesian closed (Locally cartesian closed category).
An object of is exactly a morphism into in the slice, equivalently a morphism in over ; this identifies with (Comma category, slice category, and coslice category).
Proof
By [L2], the slice-of-a-slice is canonically isomorphic to the ordinary slice .
Since is locally cartesian closed, [L1] says that is cartesian closed. Transporting this structure across the isomorphism of step 1.1 shows that is cartesian closed.
Because was an arbitrary object of , every slice of is cartesian closed. Hence is locally cartesian closed.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
6 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Emily Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Lemma 4.6.3(i) (standard reference, not scraped)