How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Slutsky's theorem for real random variables
Statement
Let and be real random variables on one probability space, and let be a real random variable (possibly on another space). If and in probability for , then and . If , define on and give any fixed value on . Then .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: and are on one probability space; , in probability, and the displayed quotient convention when .
Distributional convergence is CDF convergence at continuity points (Convergence in distribution for real random variables).
Probability convergence makes for each (Convergence in probability).
Proof
For real on a common probability space, if and in probability, then . Indeed, for every , with , At a continuity point of , take through values for which both and are continuity points. These values exist because a CDF has at most countably many jumps (for each positive integer , there are at most jumps larger than ). First let for each such , then let ; [L1] and [L2] give the assertion.
The CDF definition [L1] gives both affine operations needed below. First, because . It also gives for every constant : for use ; for , use and squeeze the left limit between and , taking through continuity points ; and for the claim is immediate. At continuity points of the transformed limit CDF, the corresponding point of is a continuity point.
The sequence is bounded in probability: CDF convergence [L1] at two continuity points outside a sufficiently large interval makes arbitrarily small. Therefore shows in probability. If , on , and the exceptional event contains and has probability at most ; the same boundedness argument gives in probability.
Addition follows from step 1.1 with and : by step 1.2, while in probability by [L2].
Apply step 1.1 to , , using step 1.2 and step 1.3, to obtain . When , apply it again to , , to obtain .
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Rick Durrett, Probability: Theory and Examples, 5th ed., Section 3.2, Exercises 3.2.12--3.2.14 (standard reference, not scraped)