Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Iterated small limits commute: either order is canonically isomorphic to the limit over the product category

Statement

Let J and K be small and let D:J×K→C. Whenever the displayed limits exist, there are canonical compatible isomorphisms

lim⁡jlim⁡kD(j,k)≅lim⁡(j,k)D(j,k)≅lim⁡klim⁡jD(j,k).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Small J,K, the diagram D, and the limits in the statement.

[F2]

The product category has objects (j,k) and componentwise morphisms (Product category and its projection functors).

[F3]

The cardinality of a small category is the cardinality of its morphism set, and a small diagram is one with a small indexing category (Assuming Choice, cardinality of a small category and κ-small diagrams).

Proof

technique · universal property
1.1

By [F2], a cone from X to D is exactly a family of arrows X→D(j,k) compatible separately with every J-arrow and every K-arrow.

F2
2.1

For each j, the K-limit turns such a compatible k-family into one unique arrow X→lim⁡kD(j,k). Compatibility in j turns these into a cone over the resulting J-diagram, and its limit turns the family into one unique arrow X→lim⁡jlim⁡kD(j,k). Both constructions reverse by the two universal properties.

F1step 1.1
3.1

Hence the first iterated limit has the universal property of the J×K-limit. By [L1] it is uniquely compatibly isomorphic to that limit. Interchanging j and k proves the second isomorphism.

F1L1step 2.1
4.1

If either index category is empty, step 1.1 describes an empty family, so each existing expression is a terminal object and [L1] gives the same canonical isomorphisms. The morphisms of J×K form a subset of the Cartesian product of the two morphism sets, so [F3] makes the product category small and no large diagram has been introduced.

L1F3step 1.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

15 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources