How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The standard induced complex is a resolution of the trivial module
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). The complex of The standard induced resolution of the trivial module is exact in positive degrees, so is a resolution of the trivial -module.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice, the standard induced complex of The standard induced resolution of the trivial module, with augmentation .
By PBW, as vector spaces, the monomials with negative-root factors before Borel factors forming a -basis; consequently (PBW gives an ordered monomial basis for the enveloping algebra, The standard induced resolution of the trivial module, The PBW filtration by tensor degree on the enveloping algebra).
The associated graded of under the PBW filtration is commutative, and the differential of is -linear and lowers the exterior degree by one (The associated graded algebra of the PBW filtration is commutative, The standard induced resolution of the trivial module).
A chain complex in an abelian category is exact in degree exactly when its -th homology object vanishes, and the boundary subobject always factors through the cycle subobject (A complex is exact at n exactly when its nth homology is zero, The boundary subobject factors through the cycle subobject).
Proof
First verify the differential. If a representative is changed by , multilinearity reduces to a wedge with first. Its other action terms and brackets not involving vanish because their exterior factors still contain . The remaining terms are , which vanish by the -balanced relation. To check balancing in the input, commute past each using : these extra terms are exactly those obtained by applying the quotient adjoint action to the wedge. For the bracket terms equality is . Thus the formula descends and commutes with left multiplication by .
Filter by total degree, PBW degree plus . The action terms preserve total degree and the bracket terms lower it by one. PBW [F1,F2] therefore identifies the associated graded differential with on , where is a basis and contracts the th exterior basis vector. Define , with in the wedge denoting that basis vector. The identities and give on polynomial degree , exterior degree : the polynomial Euler operator contributes , and contributes . In each positive total degree, division by the positive integer gives a contraction. In degree zero only the constants remain, and the augmentation is their identity.
Compute with representatives in the subalgebra using [F1]. For each pair , applying the two action terms in opposite orders leaves times the wedge with omitted; the action on the bracket term contributes the negative of this, since in . An action on an index disjoint from a bracket cancels with performing that bracket after the action, by the opposite exterior signs. Two brackets on disjoint pairs cancel by their opposite signs. For each triple the remaining terms are a common signed wedge times . These exhaust the terms, proving . The augmentation kills every action term in degree one because .
Let be a cycle with , or let and lie in the augmentation kernel. If , its leading filtered symbol is a cycle of the associated graded complex; for a nonzero scalar leading symbol cannot be in the augmentation kernel. The contraction in step 1.2 writes this symbol as in the same positive total degree. Lift to by PBW. Then is a cycle of strictly smaller total degree. Repeating terminates because total degree is a nonnegative integer. At exterior degree no nonzero term has total degree below , and at degree zero the only possible residual constant is zero by its augmentation. Consequently is a boundary. The augmentation is surjective, since maps to , so the augmented complex is exact everywhere.
The exterior powers vanish above , so the exact augmented complex is the finite resolution asserted in the Statement. This includes , when and the augmentation is the identity.
Depends on
- The standard induced resolution of the trivial module
- PBW gives an ordered monomial basis for the enveloping algebra
- The associated graded algebra of the PBW filtration is commutative
- The PBW filtration by tensor degree on the enveloping algebra
- A complex is exact at n exactly when its nth homology is zero
- The boundary subobject factors through the cycle subobject
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by The standard induced resolution of the trivial module.
Dependency tree · two levels
20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- J. van Ekeren, Topics in representation theory (IMPA 2024), Sec. 29, printed pp. 122-123 (split case, Chevalley-Eilenberg identification) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Fan Zhou, The classical and the functorial BGG resolutions (Columbia thesis 2021), Part I Theorem 9.1, p. 29 (standard reference, not scraped)