Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The standard induced complex is a resolution of the trivial module

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). The complex of The standard induced resolution of the trivial module is exact in positive degrees, so 0→B∣Φ+∣→⋯→B1→B0→C→0 is a resolution of the trivial g-module.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice, the standard induced complex (B∙,d∙) of The standard induced resolution of the trivial module, with augmentation d0 ⁣:B0→C.

[F1]

By PBW, U(g)≅U(n−)⊗U(b) as vector spaces, the monomials with negative-root factors before Borel factors forming a U(b)-basis; consequently Bk≅U(n−)⊗Λk(n−) (PBW gives an ordered monomial basis for the enveloping algebra, The standard induced resolution of the trivial module, The PBW filtration by tensor degree on the enveloping algebra).

[F2]

The associated graded of U(n−) under the PBW filtration is commutative, and the differential of B∙ is U(n−)-linear and lowers the exterior degree by one (The associated graded algebra of the PBW filtration is commutative, The standard induced resolution of the trivial module).

[F4]

A chain complex in an abelian category is exact in degree n exactly when its n-th homology object vanishes, and the boundary subobject always factors through the cycle subobject (A complex is exact at n exactly when its nth homology is zero, The boundary subobject factors through the cycle subobject).

Proof

1.1givenalgebra

First verify the differential. If a representative ξi is changed by b∈b, multilinearity reduces to a wedge with b first. Its other action terms and brackets not involving b vanish because their exterior factors still contain bˉ=0. The remaining terms are ub⊗ξˉ2∧⋯∧ξˉk−u⊗∑j=2kξˉ2∧⋯∧[b,ξj]‾∧⋯∧ξˉk, which vanish by the U(b)-balanced relation. To check balancing in the input, commute b past each ξi using bξi=ξib+[b,ξi]: these extra terms are exactly those obtained by applying the quotient adjoint action to the wedge. For the bracket terms equality is [b,[ξi,ξj]]=[ [b,ξi],ξj]+[ξi,[b,ξj]]. Thus the formula descends and commutes with left multiplication by U(g).

1.2F1F2algebraconstruct

Filter Bk≅U(n−)⊗Λkn− by total degree, PBW degree plus k. The action terms preserve total degree and the bracket terms lower it by one. PBW [F1,F2] therefore identifies the associated graded differential with δ=∑ixiιi on S(n−)⊗Λ∙n−, where xi is a basis and ιi contracts the ith exterior basis vector. Define H=∑i∂xi(xi∧−), with xi in the wedge denoting that basis vector. The identities ιi(xj∧−)+(xj∧−)ιi=δij and ∂xjxi=xi∂xj+δij give δH+Hδ=(p+k)id⁡ on polynomial degree p, exterior degree k: the polynomial Euler operator contributes p, and ∑i(xi∧−)ιi contributes k. In each positive total degree, division by the positive integer p+k gives a contraction. In degree zero only the constants remain, and the augmentation is their identity.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra

Compute d2 with representatives in the subalgebra n− using [F1]. For each pair i<j, applying the two action terms in opposite orders leaves (−1)i+j+1u(ξiξj−ξjξi) times the wedge with i,j omitted; the action on the bracket term contributes the negative of this, since ξiξj−ξjξi=[ξi,ξj] in U(n−). An action on an index disjoint from a bracket cancels with performing that bracket after the action, by the opposite exterior signs. Two brackets on disjoint pairs cancel by their opposite signs. For each triple the remaining terms are a common signed wedge times [ξi,[ξj,ξl]]+[ξj,[ξl,ξi]]+[ξl,[ξi,ξj]]=0. These exhaust the terms, proving d2=0. The augmentation kills every action term in degree one because ε(ξi)=0.

3.1F1step 2.1step 1.2algebra

Let z∈Bk be a cycle with k>0, or let k=0 and z lie in the augmentation kernel. If z≠0, its leading filtered symbol is a cycle of the associated graded complex; for k=0 a nonzero scalar leading symbol cannot be in the augmentation kernel. The contraction in step 1.2 writes this symbol as δyˉ in the same positive total degree. Lift yˉ to y∈Bk+1 by PBW. Then z−dy is a cycle of strictly smaller total degree. Repeating terminates because total degree is a nonnegative integer. At exterior degree k>0 no nonzero term has total degree below k, and at degree zero the only possible residual constant is zero by its augmentation. Consequently z is a boundary. The augmentation is surjective, since 1⊗1 maps to 1, so the augmented complex is exact everywhere.

4.1F1F4step 3.1∎

The exterior powers vanish above dim⁡n−=∣Φ+∣, so the exact augmented complex is the finite resolution asserted in the Statement. This includes n−=0, when B0=C and the augmentation is the identity.

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by The standard induced resolution of the trivial module.

Dependency tree · two levels

20 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources