How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A submodule of an arbitrary-rank free module over a PID is free
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice. If is a PID, is a free -module, and , then is free (with no finite-rank assumption on ).
Proof
Given: a basis of , a submodule , and the Axiom of Choice. By the well-ordering theorem, index the basis as .
Put and . The image of in is an ideal of , hence is either zero or free of rank one. Thus splits.
At each successor with , choose a generator and a lift ; the splitting gives . At a limit , every element has finite support, so and the nested union of the earlier bases is a basis. Transfinite induction through the terminal stage therefore gives a basis of . For , this is the empty basis of .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Weibel, An Introduction to Homological Algebra (standard reference, not scraped)