Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pass
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

One-dimensional P1 SUPG is consistent and coercive

Statement

Assume the one-dimensional model of One-dimensional stationary convection–diffusion model and uniform P1 space with homogeneous data g0=g1=0, and the form of One-dimensional residual SUPG form with the exact cell parameter. Let u∈C2([0,1]) solve −ϵu′′+bu′=f with u(0)=u(1)=0. Then ah(u,vh)=Fh(vh) for every vh∈Vh. For every vh∈Vh, ah(vh,vh)=ϵ∥vh′∥L2(0,1)2+τb2∑K∈Th∥vh′∥L2(K)2. The right-hand side is a squared norm on Vh. Consequently the finite-dimensional SUPG system has a unique solution.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A uniform interval partition, ϵ>0, b≠0, f∈C([0,1]), the homogeneous problem above, and the SUPG form and parameter.

[F1]

One-dimensional stationary convection–diffusion model and uniform P1 space: Vh consists of continuous piecewise-affine functions vanishing at both endpoints; the exact solution satisfies −ϵu′′+bu′=f.

[F2]

One-dimensional residual SUPG form with the exact cell parameter: ah(w,vh) pairs −ϵw′′+bw′ against τbvh′ cellwise and Fh pairs f against the same test perturbation; for P1 wh, wh′′=0.

[F3]

The one-dimensional SUPG parameter is positive and bounded: τ>0 for ϵ>0, b≠0, and h>0.

Proof

1.1F1givenalgebra

For vh∈Vh, continuity and piecewise absolute continuity give ∫01bvh′vh dx=b2∑K[vh2]∂K=b2(vh(1)2−vh(0)2)=0. The endpoint values vanish by [F1].

1.2F1F2givenalgebra

Integration by parts, with vh(0)=vh(1)=0, gives ϵ(u′,vh′)+(bu′,vh)=(−ϵu′′+bu′,vh)=(f,vh). The stabilization contribution to ah(u,vh) is ∑Kτ(−ϵu′′+bu′,bvh′)K, which equals ∑Kτ(f,bvh′)K by the strong equation. This is exactly the stabilization contribution to Fh, so ah(u,vh)=Fh(vh).

2.1F2F3step 1.1algebra

Substituting step 1.1 into [F2] with wh=vh yields the displayed identity. Its right side is nonnegative by [F3] and ϵ>0. If it is zero, then vh′=0 on every cell; continuity makes vh constant on [0,1], and its zero endpoints force vh=0. Hence this quadratic form is a norm squared.

3.1step 2.1givenalgebra

In a basis of the finite-dimensional space Vh, the discrete form defines a square linear map Vh→Vh∗. If a vector is in its kernel, testing with that vector and using step 2.1 gives that it is zero. Thus the map is injective, hence bijective in finite equal dimensions, so each discrete load has exactly one solution.

4.1step 1.2step 3.1algebra∎

Subtracting the discrete equation from the consistency identity in step 1.2 gives ah(u−uh,vh)=0 for every vh∈Vh; the solution exists by step 3.1.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · one level

3 results within one dependency step of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources