Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Sylvester's criterion: a real symmetric n×n matrix with n≥1 is positive definite if and only if all leading principal minors are positive

Statement

Let A∈Mn(R) be symmetric, with n≥1, and let Δk be the determinant of its leading k×k principal submatrix. Then A is positive definite if and only if

Δk>0(1≤k≤n).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A real symmetric n×n matrix A with n≥1.

[L1]

Schur block elimination gives PTMP=A0⊕S and det⁡M=det⁡A0det⁡S when the leading block A0 is invertible (For symmetric M=(ABBTC) with A invertible, a block-unitriangular congruence gives A⊕(C−BTA−1B) and factors det⁡M).

[L2]

Every real symmetric form is congruent to exactly one matrix diag⁡(Ip,−Iq,0r) (Sylvester's law of inertia: every real symmetric form is congruent to diag⁡(Ip,−Iq,0r), and (p,q,r) is unique).

[L3]

A product of two positive or two negative elements is positive, and multiplication by a positive scalar preserves and reflects strict inequalities (Sign rules for products and monotonicity of multiplication, clauses 1, 3, and 4).

[L4]

A triangular matrix has determinant equal to the product of its diagonal entries, so det⁡Ik=1 (The determinant of a triangular matrix is the product of its diagonal entries).

[L6]

The determinant of a positive-sized square matrix equals the determinant of its transpose (For every square matrix over a commutative ring, det⁡(AT)=det⁡(A)).

Proof

technique · forward determinant comparison and reverse induction on $n$
1.1

Suppose A is positive definite. Its restriction Ak to the first k coordinate subspace is positive definite for every 1≤k≤n. In the unique normal form of [L2], a negative or zero diagonal entry would give a nonzero vector of nonpositive value, so the normal form is Ik; choose invertible Pk with PkTAkPk=Ik. Taking determinants using [L4]–[L6] gives 1=(det⁡Pk)2Δk. Since det⁡Pk≠0, its square is positive by [L3], so Δk>0.

L2L3L4L5L6givenchoose
1.2

For the converse, the case n=1 reads A=[Δ1] with Δ1>0, which is positive definite.

basegiven
1.3

Assume n>1, all Δk>0, and the converse in size n−1. Write A=(abTbC), so a=Δ1>0, and set S=C−a−1bbT. For 1≤j<n, apply [L1] to the leading (j+1)×(j+1) block: Δj+1=adet⁡Sj, where Sj is the leading j×j block of S. Thus [L3] gives det⁡Sj=Δj+1/a>0.

ihL1L3given
2.1

The induction hypothesis makes S positive definite. The congruence in [L1] gives PTAP=[a]⊕S, which is positive definite because a>0 and S is. Since P is invertible, every nonzero vector is Py for a unique nonzero y, so A is positive definite as well.

step 1.3ihL1L3algebra
3.1

Step 1.1 proves the forward implication. Steps 1.2–2.1 prove the reverse implication for every n≥1 by induction.

step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1discharge-induction∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources