How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The canonical pair is a t structure
Statement
The canonical pair is a t-structure on and on each of by intersection. More generally if for and for , then for , and naturally .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The canonical pair is a t-structure on and on each of by intersection. More generally if for and for , then for , and naturally .
The t-structure axioms consist of shift inclusions, orthogonality, and a decomposition triangle (Canonical t structure on a derived category).
Canonical truncations preserve exactly the cohomology degrees on their retained sides (Canonical truncation is a complex and has the claimed cohomology).
Canonical truncations fit distinguished triangles (Canonical truncations fit a distinguished triangle).
The bounded derived localizations are fully faithful exact subcategories with the specified cohomological supports (Bounded derived localizations embed fully faithfully).
Proof
Replace by and in any left roof out of replace its vertex by . These replacements are quasi-isomorphisms, including when all cohomology vanishes. A map is zero if , since every degree has either zero source or zero target.
At only degree can be nonzero. The chain-map equations say exactly that this component kills and lands in , so it is a map . Homotopies cannot alter this component: their possibly contributing terms have source above or target below . A denominator induces an isomorphism on , so roof refinements give the same map . Conversely such a map defines a chain map from into by quotient then inclusion. The two constructions are inverse, by replacing a roof vertex as in step 1.1; all maps are the specified cohomology maps, hence natural.
The identity gives the two shift inclusions. Step 1.1 with gives orthogonality. The triangle gives the required decomposition with the prescribed cohomology supports. These verify all axioms.
Canonical truncations preserve every one-sided or two-sided cohomological boundedness condition. The bounded embeddings are full and exact, so the same Hom vanishing and the same decomposition triangles lie in each bounded category. This proves the restricted t-structures.
Depends on
Used by
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Canonical t structure on a derived category.
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Lecture 3, section 3, definition and Main example, pp. 28–29 (standard reference, not scraped)