Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Chevalley–Eilenberg differential squares to zero

Statement

For every n and every fCn(g,M), one has dn+1dnf=0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A Lie algebra g, a representation ρ on M, and the differential with the declared signs.

[L1]

The two-sum differential and its zero-based signs are fixed in Chevalley–Eilenberg differential.

[L2]

The representation identity is [ρ(x),ρ(y)]=ρ([x,y]) (Representations of Lie algebras).

[L3]

The bracket satisfies Jacobi (Lie algebras over a field).

Proof

technique · expand and group by term type
1.1

Expand d(df) using [L1], and let Xij denote the ordered list obtained by omitting xi,xj. For fixed i<j, the outer action by xi followed by the action of xj has coefficient (1)i+j1, whereas the reverse order has coefficient (1)i+j. Their sum is (1)i+j1[ρ(xi),ρ(xj)]f(Xij). There is exactly one term in which the outer differential forms [xi,xj] and the inner differential lets that new first argument act; its coefficient is (1)i+j, so it contributes (1)i+jρ([xi,xj])f(Xij). These three terms cancel by [L2].

L1L2algebra
1.2

It remains to account for action--bracket terms on three distinct indices. Fix i<j and k{i,j}. Let a be the number of i,j that are less than k, and b the number greater than k, so a+b=2. Acting first by xk and then forming [xi,xj] has coefficient (1)i+j+kb. Forming [xi,xj] first and then letting xk act has coefficient (1)i+j+k+1a. The exponents differ by 1a+b=32a, which is odd, while both terms have the same value ρ(xk)f([xi,xj],Xijk). Thus they cancel. This covers every mixed term with three distinct original indices.

L1algebra
2.1

Consider the terms in which both differentials use their bracket sums. For two disjoint pairs, the two possible orders have the same scalar sign: the numbers of cross-pair index shifts in the two orders add to 4, so their sign exponents differ by an even integer. Their cochain values are f([xp,xq],[xi,xj],Xijpq) and f([xi,xj],[xp,xq],Xijpq), which cancel because f is alternating. For i<j<k, the three terms in which the second bracket uses the bracket created by the first have common coefficient (1)i+j+k1 and bracket sum [[xi,xj],xk]+[[xj,xk],xi][[xi,xk],xj]. Since [[xi,xk],xj]=[[xk,xi],xj], this is zero by Jacobi [L3]. The expansion has now been partitioned into action--action plus created-bracket action (step 1.1), mixed action--bracket terms (step 1.2), disjoint double brackets, and nested double brackets; hence d2f=0. For n<0 or a zero cochain space the assertion is the unique zero composite, and for n=0 step 1.1 is exactly the representation identity.

L1L3step 1.11.2algebra

Depends on

Used by

Cited to discharge well-definedness by Chevalley–Eilenberg differential.

Dependency tree · two levels

8 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources