How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The free unital ring functor is left adjoint to the underlying-set functor
Statement
The free-word-ring construction extends to a functor left adjoint to the underlying-set functor. Its unit sends to the basis element of the one-letter word .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A set , its free word ring, a unital ring , and a function .
For every set , integer-valued finite formal sums of words in form a unital ring (Integer-valued finite formal sums of words form unital convolution rings).
Every map from a basis set to a module extends uniquely to a linear map from the corresponding free module (Universal property of the free module on a set).
Supplied objectwise universal arrows assemble uniquely into a left adjoint (Chosen objectwise universal arrows assemble uniquely into a left adjoint).
Proof
Send a word to in , and send the empty word to . The generator is represented by the basis word .
Apply [L2] over to extend this word-evaluation function uniquely to a -linear map .
Expanding convolution as a finite sum shows , and the empty-word basis vector maps to . Thus is a unit-preserving ring homomorphism, including when is the zero ring.
Any ring homomorphism extending must send every word basis vector to the corresponding product and is additive, so it equals by uniqueness in [L2].
Hence the generator inclusion is a universal arrow from every set to the underlying-set functor on rings. By [L3] these universal arrows assemble into the free-ring functor and the asserted adjunction; for the free ring is .
Depends on
- Integer-valued finite formal sums of words form unital convolution rings
- Universal property of the free module on a set
- The free-monoid functor is left adjoint to the underlying-set functor
- Chosen objectwise universal arrows assemble uniquely into a left adjoint
- Ring homomorphism: additive, multiplicative, and required to send $1$ to $1$
- Unital rings and unit-preserving ring homomorphisms form the large locally small category $\mathbf{Ring}$
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
21 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Corollary 5.5.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Riehl, Category Theory in Context, 2nd ed., Example 4.1.10(vi) (standard reference, not scraped)
- D. Mehrle, Category Theory Part III, Example 5.18 (standard reference, not scraped)