Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-26
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A transitive imprimitive action embeds modulo its kernel in an imprimitive wreath product

Statement

Let G act transitively on Ω, and let B⊆Ω be a nontrivial block. Put Σ:={ g⋅B:g∈G },GB:={ g∈G:g⋅B=B }. Let K be the permutation group induced by G on Σ, and let H be the permutation group induced by GB on B.

Choose for each C∈Σ an element tC∈G with tC⋅B=C,tB=e. Then there is a homomorphism Φ:G⟶H≀ΣK whose kernel is exactly the kernel of the given action on Ω.

In particular, if the action of G on Ω is faithful, then Φ is an embedding.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A transitive action of G on Ω, a block B⊆Ω, the block system Σ:={ g⋅B:g∈G }, and a choice of tC∈G with tC⋅B=C and tB=e.

[L1]

A block B satisfies: for every g∈G, either g⋅B=B or (g⋅B)∩B=∅ (Blocks and block systems for a group action).

[L2]

The imprimitive wreath product H≀ΣK is the semidirect product HΣ⋊K acting on B×Σ by (f,k)⋅(b,C)=(f(k⋅C)⋅b, k⋅C). (The imprimitive wreath product of permutation groups).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1L1construct

For each g∈G, let kg be the permutation of Σ induced by g, so kg(C)=g⋅C. For each C∈Σ, the element tC−1gtg−1⋅C stabilizes B setwise because tC−1gtg−1⋅C⋅B=tC−1g⋅(g−1⋅C)=tC−1⋅C=B. Let fg(C)∈H be the induced permutation of B defined by this element.

2.1step 1.1L2algebra

Define Φ(g):=(fg,kg). For C∈Σ, the function component of Φ(g)Φ(h) at C is fg(C) fh(g−1⋅C), while tC−1gh t(gh)−1⋅C=(tC−1gtg−1⋅C)(tg−1⋅C−1hth−1g−1⋅C), so it induces the same permutation of B as fgh(C). Also kgh=kgkh. Hence Φ(gh)=Φ(g)Φ(h).

3.1step 1.1step 2.1L2algebra

Identify Ω with B×Σ by Ψ(b,C):=tC⋅b. Then for every g∈G one has Ψ(Φ(g)⋅(b,C))=tg⋅C⋅(fg(g⋅C)⋅b)=g⋅(tC⋅b)=g⋅Ψ(b,C). So Φ(g)=1 exactly when g fixes every point of Ω.

4.1step 3.1discharge-construct∎

Step 3.1 shows that ker⁡Φ is the kernel of the given action. Therefore a faithful action makes ker⁡Φ=1, so in that case Φ is an embedding into H≀ΣK.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources