How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The two-adic Hilbert symbol formula
Statement
Write and with and odd units . Put
for odd . Then
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Elements and in with odd units .
The Hilbert symbol is equivalent to solvability of and to the norm condition from (Equivalent formulations of the Hilbert symbol).
The Hilbert symbol depends only on square classes (The Hilbert symbol depends only on square classes).
An element of is a square exactly when its valuation is even and its odd unit part is modulo (Square criterion in Q_2).
Proof
By [L2], only the parities of and the odd unit classes modulo matter, so it is enough to treat and . As in the odd-prime proof, [L1] gives three useful identities: the symbol is symmetric; for every ; and, if , then . In particular, so the case reduces to the case .
First suppose , so both arguments are odd units. If one of is , then the symbol is . The remaining positive cases are , , and up to symmetry: they are witnessed respectively by For the negative cases , any primitive solution of would have at least one of odd. If exactly one of were odd, then the right-hand side would be congruent to or modulo ; if both were odd, it would be congruent to or modulo . None of these is a -adic square by [L3], so these pairs have symbol . Thus
Next suppose and . If , then . If , the formula predicts : for and the identities show that the symbol is , while for and every primitive value of or is congruent to , , , or modulo , so the symbol is by [L3]. If , then for any primitive solution of the right-hand side is congruent modulo to one of , , or , namely to , , , , or ; none is a square, so . If , the formula predicts : for and the choice gives right-hand sides and , both congruent to modulo and therefore square by [L3], so the symbol is ; for and , the same parity check as above shows that is never a square modulo , so the symbol is . Therefore for every odd-unit representative .
Step 3.1 and symmetry give the case . For odd units modulo , direct calculation gives in . In the remaining case , step 1.1 and step 3.1 therefore give the exponent which is exactly the displayed formula. Hence the formula holds for all and in .
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Andrew V. Sutherland, 18.782 Lecture 10, Theorem 10.9 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Sam Raskin, Introduction to the Arithmetic Theory of Quadratic Forms, Proposition 3.16.3 (standard reference, not scraped)