How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The gl_N evaluation formula satisfies RTT
Statement
Let , let be a left -module with action , and let . The assignment in Evaluation modules of the type-A RTT Yangian extends to a representation of on . In particular, the dual-natural action is a -representation, and its unnormalized auxiliary Lax matrix equals .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The RTT Yangian of The type-A RTT Yangian in the rational i-normalization, a -module , its action , and a spectral shift .
The type-A RTT Yangian in the rational i-normalization: , and the defining relation is .
Evaluation modules of the type-A RTT Yangian: the proposed generator action is , and the dual-natural action is .
The type-A RTT Yangian in the rational i-normalization reindexes Matrix units and the Kronecker delta: for , is the unit at zero-based position and is supported at coordinate , so .
The RTT relation has an explicit component commutator form: for is equivalent to the matrix RTT relation.
Proof
Let be the standard column basis. By [F3], , so for every . Hence and . On a dual basis vector , the explicit commutator is . The right side is also , by the same formula. Thus the dual-natural operators satisfy the matrix-unit bracket and form a -representation.
Put , , and . By [F4], the required component identity is the RTT relation to check. Under [F2], its left side is by the bracket relation. In the parenthesized difference on the right, the quadratic terms cancel because both are . Its linear terms are , since . Multiplication by the outer factor therefore gives the same left side. Thus every component RTT relation holds.
The component relations are exactly the coefficients of the matrix relation [F1]. Thus the images of every defining relation vanish, so the assignment on the free generators factors through the RTT quotient and defines the representation . For , its auxiliary matrix is by the explicit sum ; multiplying by gives .
Depends on
Used by
- Finite periodic fundamental evaluation chain and transfer matrix Definition
- The rational R-matrix intertwines two fundamental evaluation orders Lemma
Cited to discharge well-definedness by Evaluation modules of the type-A RTT Yangian.
Dependency tree · two levels
7 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- A. I. Molev, M. L. Nazarov, and G. I. Olshanski, Yangians and classical Lie algebras (standard reference, not scraped)
- L. D. Faddeev, How Algebraic Bethe Ansatz Works for Integrable Model (standard reference, not scraped)