Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 4 results · all verified · 1 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 3 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Elliptic finite-difference methods — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These calculations show exactness of the five-point scheme on a quadratic, the difference between midpoint flux and independently expanded variable-coefficient stencils, the first-order error caused by a one-sided Neumann row, and a mesh-uniform maximum-norm inverse bound for the one-dimensional Dirichlet Laplacian.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)Open item page →

A one-sided Neumann closure gives only first-order error

Example

Let h=1/N for an integer N≥2, xi=ih, δh2Vi=(Vi+1−2Vi+Vi−1)/h2, and Dh+V0=(V1−V0)/h. The exact solution u(x)=x2 solves −u′′=−2 on (0,1) with u′(0)=0 and u(1)=1. Discretize the interior equation by −δh2Vi=−2 for 1≤i<N, impose the one-sided Neumann row Dh+V0=0, and impose VN=1. The unique grid solution is

Vi=xi2+h(1−xi),

so max⁡0≤i≤N∣Vi−u(xi)∣=h. The boundary residual of the exact samples is Dh+u(0)−u′(0)=h, and the global error is only first order.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integer N≥2, h=1/N, xi=ih, the displayed centered second difference and one-sided forward Neumann row, and the stated mixed discrete equations.

[A1]

The grid equations are −δh2Vi=−2 for 1≤i<N, Dh+V0=0, and VN=1.

Verification

1.1givenA1algebra

For the exact samples ui=xi2, Dh+u0=(h2−0)/h=h, whereas u′(0)=0. Thus the imposed Neumann row has residual exactly h.

1.2A1algebra

Define Vi=xi2+h(1−xi). Then V0=h, V1=h, so Dh+V0=0; also VN=1. Since the second difference of the quadratic part is 2 and the second difference of the affine part is 0, −δh2Vi=−2 at every interior node. Hence V satisfies [A1].

2.1A1step 1.2algebra

If two grid solutions existed, their difference d would satisfy δh2di=0 for 1≤i<N, Dh+d0=0, and dN=0. The recurrence says di−di−1 is constant in i; the forward boundary row makes that constant 0, and dN=0 then makes every di=0. Therefore the solution in step 1.2 is unique.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2algebra∎

The error is Vi−ui=h(1−xi). Because 0≤xi≤1, its maximum absolute value is h, attained at i=0. The boundary residual and global error are both first order in h.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

A Dirichlet Laplacian inverse is uniformly bounded in the maximum norm

Example

For h=1/N, N≥2, let AN act on vectors (v1,…,vN−1) with v0=vN=0 by

(ANv)i=2vi−vi−1−vi+1h2,1≤i<N.

With the vector maximum norm ∥v∥∞=max⁡1≤i<N∣vi∣, the inverse satisfies ∥AN−1∥∞→∞≤1/8 for every N≥2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: N≥2, h=1/N, v0=vN=0, and the displayed matrix action of AN.

[A1]

The grid vector norm is ∥v∥∞=max⁡1≤i<N∣vi∣, and the matrix uses zero endpoint values.

Verification

1.1givenA1algebra

Set xi=ih and ϕi=xi(1−xi)/2 for 0≤i≤N. Then ϕ0=ϕN=0, −δh2ϕi=1, so ANϕ=1, and 0≤ϕi≤1/8 because x(1−x)≤1/4 on [0,1].

1.2givenA1algebra

If w0=wN=0 and ANw≥0 at every interior index, a negative interior minimum wk<0 would give (ANw)k=(2wk−wk−1−wk+1)/h2≤0. Equality is then forced, so both neighboring values equal wk; repeating this along the finite grid reaches a zero endpoint, a contradiction. Therefore wi≥0 everywhere.

2.1givenA1step 1.2algebra

The kernel of AN is zero: if ANv=0 and v has a positive interior maximum, the equation forces both neighboring values to equal that maximum, which propagates to a zero endpoint; applying the same argument to −v rules out a negative minimum. Thus v=0, and the square finite matrix is invertible.

3.1step 1.1step 1.2step 2.1A1algebra∎

Let g be any right-hand side, let v=AN−1g, and put M=∥g∥∞. If M=0, then v=0. If M>0, AN(Mϕ+v)=M1+g≥0 and AN(Mϕ−v)=M1−g≥0; step 1.2 makes both grid functions nonnegative. Hence ∣vi∣≤Mϕi≤M/8 for each i, proving ∥AN−1g∥∞≤∥g∥∞/8.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

Flux and expanded variable-coefficient stencils differ by a second-order term

Example

On Ω=(0,1)2, take a(x,y)=1+x2 and u(x,y)=x2. Then ∂x(a∂xu)=2+6x2 and the y-flux is zero. Let Dhflux be the midpoint face-flux difference in the positive x direction, and let Dhexpanded=a(xi,yj)δx,h2u+ax(xi,yj)Dx,h0u, where δx,h2 is the centered second difference and Dx,h0 is the centered first difference. At each interior node,

Dhfluxu−Dhexpandedu=hx2/2.

Thus the two discrete operators are distinct even though both approximate the same continuous divergence.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The midpoint face-flux convention of Rectangular grid and Dirichlet flux stencil, a(x,y)=1+x2, u(x,y)=x2, and a rectangular uniform grid on (0,1)2.

[F1]

Rectangular grid and Dirichlet flux stencil: the positive x-flux at a face is the midpoint value of a times the forward or backward difference of u across that face.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

At x=xi and h=hx, the two midpoint coefficients are a+=1+(x+h/2)2 and a−=1+(x−h/2)2, while the one-sided differences of x2 are D+u=2x+h and D−u=2x−h. Therefore Dhfluxu=(a+(2x+h)−a−(2x−h))/h=2+6x2+h2/2.

2.1F1step 1.1algebra∎

The centered differences are δx,h2u=2 and Dx,h0u=2x, while a(x,y)=1+x2 and ax(x,y)=2x. Hence Dhexpandedu=2(1+x2)+(2x)(2x)=2+6x2, so subtracting from step 1.1 gives exactly hx2/2.

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedprecheck passOpen item page →

The five-point Laplacian is exact on a quadratic solution

Example

On any rectangle Ω=(0,Lx)×(0,Ly), let u(x,y)=x2+y2, a≡1, f=−4, and impose the exact sampled Dirichlet boundary values. On every rectangular uniform grid with Nx,Ny≥2, the five-point Dirichlet scheme returns Uij=u(xi,yj) at all nodes.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The five-point stencil and grid inner product of Rectangular grid and Dirichlet flux stencil, the positive face bound af=1, and the exact sampled boundary values of u(x,y)=x2+y2.

[F1]

Rectangular grid and Dirichlet flux stencil: when a≡1, Aha is the positive five-point operator −Dx+Dx−−Dy+Dy−.

[F2]

Discrete summation by parts, Poincaré inequality and inverse bound: for positive face values, the homogeneous Dirichlet matrix has zero kernel and is invertible.

Verification

1.1givenF1algebra

For every interior node, Dx+Dx−xi2=2 and Dy+Dy−(yj2)=2; the other coordinate second differences vanish. Thus (Ah1u∗)ij=−(2+2)=−4=f(xi,yj).

2.1givenstep 1.1algebra

The sampled values uij∗ also satisfy the exact Dirichlet boundary rows, so they solve the full discrete system.

3.1F2step 2.1algebra∎

Any two discrete solutions have a difference in Xh,0 in the kernel of Ah1. By [F2] that kernel is zero, so the solution is unique and equals u∗.

Sources