How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Elliptic finite-difference methods — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
2 · Summary
These calculations show exactness of the five-point scheme on a quadratic, the difference between midpoint flux and independently expanded variable-coefficient stencils, the first-order error caused by a one-sided Neumann row, and a mesh-uniform maximum-norm inverse bound for the one-dimensional Dirichlet Laplacian.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
A one-sided Neumann closure gives only first-order error
Example
Let for an integer , , , and . The exact solution solves on with and . Discretize the interior equation by for , impose the one-sided Neumann row , and impose . The unique grid solution is
so . The boundary residual of the exact samples is , and the global error is only first order.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An integer , , , the displayed centered second difference and one-sided forward Neumann row, and the stated mixed discrete equations.
The grid equations are for , , and .
Verification
For the exact samples , , whereas . Thus the imposed Neumann row has residual exactly .
Define . Then , , so ; also . Since the second difference of the quadratic part is and the second difference of the affine part is , at every interior node. Hence satisfies [A1].
If two grid solutions existed, their difference would satisfy for , , and . The recurrence says is constant in ; the forward boundary row makes that constant , and then makes every . Therefore the solution in step 1.2 is unique.
The error is . Because , its maximum absolute value is , attained at . The boundary residual and global error are both first order in .
A Dirichlet Laplacian inverse is uniformly bounded in the maximum norm
Example
For , , let act on vectors with by
With the vector maximum norm , the inverse satisfies for every .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: , , , and the displayed matrix action of .
The grid vector norm is , and the matrix uses zero endpoint values.
Verification
Set and for . Then , , so , and because on .
If and at every interior index, a negative interior minimum would give . Equality is then forced, so both neighboring values equal ; repeating this along the finite grid reaches a zero endpoint, a contradiction. Therefore everywhere.
The kernel of is zero: if and has a positive interior maximum, the equation forces both neighboring values to equal that maximum, which propagates to a zero endpoint; applying the same argument to rules out a negative minimum. Thus , and the square finite matrix is invertible.
Let be any right-hand side, let , and put . If , then . If , and ; step 1.2 makes both grid functions nonnegative. Hence for each , proving .
Flux and expanded variable-coefficient stencils differ by a second-order term
Example
On , take and . Then and the -flux is zero. Let be the midpoint face-flux difference in the positive direction, and let , where is the centered second difference and is the centered first difference. At each interior node,
Thus the two discrete operators are distinct even though both approximate the same continuous divergence.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The midpoint face-flux convention of Rectangular grid and Dirichlet flux stencil, , , and a rectangular uniform grid on .
Rectangular grid and Dirichlet flux stencil: the positive -flux at a face is the midpoint value of times the forward or backward difference of across that face.
Verification
At and , the two midpoint coefficients are and , while the one-sided differences of are and . Therefore .
The centered differences are and , while and . Hence , so subtracting from step 1.1 gives exactly .
The five-point Laplacian is exact on a quadratic solution
Example
On any rectangle , let , , , and impose the exact sampled Dirichlet boundary values. On every rectangular uniform grid with , the five-point Dirichlet scheme returns at all nodes.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The five-point stencil and grid inner product of Rectangular grid and Dirichlet flux stencil, the positive face bound , and the exact sampled boundary values of .
Rectangular grid and Dirichlet flux stencil: when , is the positive five-point operator .
Discrete summation by parts, Poincaré inequality and inverse bound: for positive face values, the homogeneous Dirichlet matrix has zero kernel and is invertible.
Verification
For every interior node, and ; the other coordinate second differences vanish. Thus .
The sampled values also satisfy the exact Dirichlet boundary rows, so they solve the full discrete system.
Any two discrete solutions have a difference in in the kernel of . By [F2] that kernel is zero, so the solution is unique and equals .