Alphabeta Math
AlgorithmAlgorithm: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedverified 2026-10-22 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite compatible leapfrog evolution

Definition

Use the finite cochain data fixed by the preceding definition item, namely finite real coordinate spaces C0,C1,C2,C3, maps D0,D1,D2 with D1D0=D2D1=0, and symmetric positive-definite mass maps M1,M2. Inputs are rational matrices D0,D1,D2,M1,M2, rational initial coordinates b0∈C2 and d1/2∈(C1)∗, a positive rational step size τ, and an integer N≥0. The matrices and states use the fixed ordered bases and dual bases from that definition. All arithmetic is exact over Q; floating-point arithmetic is not part of this algorithm.

First compute R=M1−1 once by fixed-order, no-row-swap Gauss–Jordan elimination of the augmented matrix [M1∣In1]. For each pivot column j=1,…,n1, let p be the current entry in position (j,j). If p=0, return an inconsistency error. Otherwise divide row j by p and, for every k≠j, replace row k by row k minus its current column-j entry times row j. After all columns are processed, let R be the right block. For n1=0, take the unique empty matrix for R and perform no elimination.

Set (b,d):=(b0,d1/2) and record this initial state. For each n=0,…,N−1, in the stated order compute

bnew:=b−τD1Rd,dnew:=d+τD1TM2bnew.

Append (bnew,dnew) to the output list and then set (b,d):=(bnew,dnew). After the loop, return R together with the list of the N+1 states (bn,dn+1/2) for 0≤n≤N. The error branch is unreachable on admissible inputs; the separate finite-step termination lemma proves this and the exact inverse output.

Remarks

The update uses the state order bn,dn+1/2 and this ordering fixes the sign of the cross term in its invariant. Positive definiteness makes every pivot in the fixed no-row-swap schedule nonzero; the separate lemma proves this by Schur-complement induction. The source’s Whitney finite-element leapfrog has its own spaces, mass matrices, boundary conditions and CFL hypotheses. This algorithm makes no claim of being its spatial discretization or of giving a continuum stability or convergence result.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources