Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedprecheck pendingverified 2026-10-23 (gpt-6.1-sol)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Negative acoustic response yields exponential mode growth

Physical scope

Exact counterexample for the linearized equations of an explicitly adopted smooth barotropic state relation with negative fixed-entropy pressure response. It is not a finite-amplitude solution or an empirical claim about a realized material.

Statement refuted

Let U⊂(0,∞)×R be open and let e∈C2(U), with T=es and p=−ev (each partial derivative holds the other state coordinate fixed). Fix (vb,sb)∈U with Tb=es(vb,sb)>0 and ess(vb,sb)>0, and put ρb=1/vb. Let P∈C1((0,∞)) agree with −ev(1/ρ,sb) on an open interval Jρ⊂(0,∞) containing ρb, with (1/ρ,sb)∈U for every ρ∈Jρ, and suppose P′(ρb)<0. For any nonempty open time interval I⊆R, let δρ∈C2(I×R3,R) and w∈C2(I×R3,R3) solve the first-variation equations about the uniform rest state (ρ,u)=(ρb,0), ∂tδρ+ρbdiv⁡w=0,ρb∂tw+P′(ρb)∇δρ=0, where div⁡w=∑i=13∂xiwi and ∇δρ=(∂xiδρ)i=13. The false assertion is that for every such state and solution, at each fixed x∈R3, sup⁡t∈I(∣δρ(t,x)∣+∑i=13wi(t,x)2)<∞. In SI units, t is in seconds, x in metres, vb in m3 kg−1, sb in J kg−1 K−1, e in J kg−1, Tb in kelvins, p and P in pascals, ρb and δρ in kg m−3, and w in m s−1.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A smooth local state relation with Tb>0, ess(vb,sb)>0, a positive reference density, and a first-variation system about rest.

[L1]

Positive-response linear sound in adopted barotropic fluid: for the stated fixed-entropy barotropic restriction of a C2 local state relation, the first variation is ∂tδρ+ρbdiv⁡w=0, ρb∂tw+cs2∇δρ=0, with cs2=P′(ρb)=vb2evv(vb,sb). The current theorem carrier and complete conditional proof were inspected, and its current Step 1 readiness record reports ready; this records authoring readiness, not independent proof approval.

[A1]

The local state relation and the negative-response coefficient below are adopted mathematical model data. No assertion is made that a measured material has this response.

Counterexample

Given: Choose vb>0, Tb>0, pb>0, sb∈R, eb∈R, and constants C>0, A>0 with units chosen so every term below has units J kg−1. On a sufficiently small open rectangle about (vb,sb) with v>0, define e(v,s)=eb+Tb(s−sb)+C2(s−sb)2−pb(v−vb)−A2(v−vb)2. The rectangle can be chosen so that es=Tb+C(s−sb)>0. At the reference state, ess=C>0, evv=−A<0, ρb=1/vb>0, and cs2=vb2evv=−Avb2<0. Define the global barotropic pressure law P:(0,∞)→R by P(ρ)=pb+A(1/ρ−vb). It is C∞ on (0,∞) and agrees with p(1/ρ,sb)=−ev(1/ρ,sb) whenever (1/ρ,sb) lies in the local rectangle. Thus it supplies the global C1 pressure law required by the adopted model while retaining the chosen local state relation; no global sign condition on P is imposed. Let I=R, choose k∈R3∖{0} and amplitude a0≠0, set α=−cs2∣k∣>0, and define δρ(t,x)=a0eαtcos⁡(k⋅x),w(t,x)=−αa0ρb∣k∣2keαtsin⁡(k⋅x).

1.1A1L1givenalgebra

Differentiation of the chosen state relation gives Tb>0, ess=C>0, and evv=−A<0 at (vb,sb). The global law has P∈C1((0,∞)) and P′(ρ)=−A/ρ2; on the local density interval its equality with p(1/ρ,sb) gives P′(ρb)=vb2evv=−Avb2=cs2<0.

2.1L1givenstep 1.1algebra

The derivatives of the stated mode are ∂tδρ=αδρ, div⁡w=−αδρ/ρb, ∂tw=−α2a0keαtsin⁡(k⋅x)/(ρb∣k∣2), and ∇δρ=−a0keαtsin⁡(k⋅x). Therefore the continuity equation holds, and the momentum equation holds because −α2/∣k∣2−cs2=0 by the definition of α.

3.1A1L1step 2.1algebra∎

Since α>0 and k⋅x cannot have both sine and cosine zero, at every fixed x either δρ(t,x) or w(t,x) has a nonzero coefficient multiplying eαt. Thus the pair is unbounded in time on I=R, refuting the stated assertion. This smooth first-order solution concerns only the linearized mathematical system; it supplies no finite-amplitude solution or empirical material claim.

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources