How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Negative acoustic response yields exponential mode growth
Exact counterexample for the linearized equations of an explicitly adopted smooth barotropic state relation with negative fixed-entropy pressure response. It is not a finite-amplitude solution or an empirical claim about a realized material.
Statement refuted
Let be open and let , with and (each partial derivative holds the other state coordinate fixed). Fix with and , and put . Let agree with on an open interval containing , with for every , and suppose . For any nonempty open time interval , let and solve the first-variation equations about the uniform rest state , where and . The false assertion is that for every such state and solution, at each fixed , In SI units, is in seconds, in metres, in , in , in , in kelvins, and in pascals, and in , and in .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A smooth local state relation with , , a positive reference density, and a first-variation system about rest.
Positive-response linear sound in adopted barotropic fluid: for the stated fixed-entropy barotropic restriction of a local state relation, the first variation is , , with . The current theorem carrier and complete conditional proof were inspected, and its current Step 1 readiness record reports ready; this records authoring readiness, not independent proof approval.
The local state relation and the negative-response coefficient below are adopted mathematical model data. No assertion is made that a measured material has this response.
Counterexample
Given: Choose , , , , , and constants , with units chosen so every term below has units . On a sufficiently small open rectangle about with , define The rectangle can be chosen so that . At the reference state, , , , and . Define the global barotropic pressure law by . It is on and agrees with whenever lies in the local rectangle. Thus it supplies the global pressure law required by the adopted model while retaining the chosen local state relation; no global sign condition on is imposed. Let , choose and amplitude , set , and define
Differentiation of the chosen state relation gives , , and at . The global law has and ; on the local density interval its equality with gives .
The derivatives of the stated mode are , , , and . Therefore the continuity equation holds, and the momentum equation holds because by the definition of .
Since and cannot have both sine and cosine zero, at every fixed either or has a nonzero coefficient multiplying . Thus the pair is unbounded in time on , refuting the stated assertion. This smooth first-order solution concerns only the linearized mathematical system; it supplies no finite-amplitude solution or empirical material claim.