How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Unsteady pathlines differ from streamlines
Smooth kinematic velocity field on Newtonian spacetime, with pathlines and streamlines defined on the same spatial region. No momentum equation, constitutive law, or empirical flow is asserted.
Statement refuted
Whenever both curves exist on a common interval, for every velocity field , every initial point , and every frozen time , the pathline satisfying equals the streamline through at time when the streamline parameter is identified with .
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: An open time interval , a spatial region , and the definitions of pathline and frozen-time streamline from the stated velocity field.
Classical frames, primitive quantities and SI units: a pathline solves ; a streamline at fixed solves with measured in seconds.
Counterexample
Given: Let , , and , where has units s and has units m s. Choose frozen time and initial point .
Solve the pathline equations , , and with , , . They give , , and .
At frozen time , the velocity is , so by [F1] the streamline through the same initial point is . Under , its -coordinate is constant, whereas step 1.1 has , which differs for every . Thus the pathline and streamline are distinct.
Since is not identically zero, this is an unsteady field. The explicit distinct curves in step 2.1 refute the universal assertion for an unsteady flow.