Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-luna)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Correlated preparations with identical marginals diverge

Statement refuted

For fixed finite system and environment spaces and a fixed joint unitary U, the final system matrix Tr⁡E(UωU∗) is determined by the initial system marginal Tr⁡Eω for every positive semidefinite trace-one matrix ω.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Two qubit spaces HS=HE=C2, the standard ordered product basis, and the finite partial trace over HE.

[F1]

Partial trace over a finite tensor factor: in product-basis coordinates, (Tr⁡ER)aa′=∑b=01R(a,b),(a′,b); the second tensor factor is contracted.

[F2]

Independent-preparation reduced unitary channel: a fixed finite unitary and a fixed product preparation ρ⊗σE induce a finite channel. This result makes no claim that correlated joint preparations are determined by the system marginal alone.

Counterexample

1.1givenF1algebra

Let ∣ψ±⟩=(∣00⟩±∣11⟩)/2 and ω±=∣ψ±⟩⟨ψ±∣; each ω± is positive semidefinite with trace one. Using [F1], the cross terms ∣00⟩⟨11∣ and ∣11⟩⟨00∣ vanish under Tr⁡E because their environment indices differ, while the diagonal terms give Tr⁡Eω+=Tr⁡Eω−=I2/2.

2.1givenF1F2step 1.1algebra∎

Define U∣a,b⟩=∣a,a⊕b⟩ for a,b∈{0,1}, where ⊕ is addition modulo two. This CNOT map permutes the orthonormal product basis and is therefore unitary. It sends ∣ψ±⟩ to ∣±⟩⊗∣0⟩, where ∣±⟩=(∣0⟩±∣1⟩)/2. Thus Tr⁡E(Uω±U∗)=∣±⟩⟨±∣, and the outputs are distinct because their (0,1) matrix entries are 1/2 and −1/2. Equal system marginals therefore do not determine the final system state for these correlated preparations, refuting the claim. The product-preparation theorem [F2] is unaffected.

Remarks

The diagram uses the standard circuit convention: horizontal wires carry the system S and environment E from left to right; the filled control dot is on S, and ⊕ is the target on E. It depicts the same basis permutation defined in step 2.1 and is illustrative only.

SE

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources