How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A one-spin path can close its spectral gap
Statement
Let one site of have spin dimension , let , and define the finite-volume Hamiltonian path on , with all other interaction terms zero. This is a finite-range path with a uniform finite weighted-interaction norm and gapped endpoint Hamiltonians, but its gap closes at . Thus endpoint gaps alone do not imply a uniform path gap.
Statement references
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A single spin space , the path in the Statement, and the weighted-interaction convention. Energies are dimensionless in the chosen positive energy unit, , and is dimensionless.
Weighted interactions and gapped finite-volume paths: a one-site self-adjoint matrix path with a bounded coefficient is a finite-range path with finite -interaction and derivative norms.
Proof
Given: and .
The interaction has only one nonzero term, on a singleton support, with coefficient ; its derivative is the constant . The two weighted norms are finite because the support and coefficient are bounded and every admissible weight is positive at distance zero.
The eigenvalues of are and . The ground eigenvalue is , the excited eigenvalue is , so the gap is . It is at each endpoint and at . The path therefore has gapped endpoints but no uniform positive gap on .