How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Hard-core exclusion does not guarantee a finite unscaled-gravity limit
Statement refuted
Fix and consider the fixed-density sequence indexed by . Let be the box volume, the canonical partition function, and . The per-particle free-energy density is (in joules), and the per-volume free-energy density is (in joules per cubic metre). Here a “finite extensive free-energy density” means that the chosen normalized sequence has a finite real thermodynamic-limit value as . The claim refuted is that a fixed hard-core exclusion distance and fixed particle density guarantee this for the unscaled Newtonian long-range attraction.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The unscaled point attraction , a positive hard-core separation, and boxes with side proportional to .
For , a cubic packing with fixed minimum separation still has interaction energy at most on positive-volume position sets, and its canonical free energy per particle tends to . (Point collapse and unscaled gravity nonextensivity)
Counterexample
Fix a grid spacing larger than the hard-core radius and take particles, one in each small cube around the cubic grid sites. The enclosing box has side proportional to and the product of the small cubes is an admissible positive-volume position set, matching [F1].
By [F1], . Here , so . Neither normalization has a finite real thermodynamic-limit value, contradicting the claimed guarantee.