CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-07-31

How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Homotopy relative to a fixed subspace, and path homotopy relative to endpoints, are equivalence relations

Statement

For fixed spaces $X, Y$ and a fixed subspace $A \subseteq X$ , the relation $≃_{A}$ is an equivalence relation on the set of continuous maps $X \to Y$ that have a prescribed restriction to $A$ . In particular ordinary homotopy is an equivalence relation on the continuous maps $X \to Y$ .

For fixed endpoints $y_{0}, y_{1} \in Y$ , path homotopy relative to the endpoints is an equivalence relation on the set of paths from $y_{0}$ to $y_{1}$ .

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Spaces $X, Y$ , a subspace $A \subseteq X$ , and the relations defined in Homotopies of continuous maps, homotopies relative to a subspace, and path homotopies relative to the endpoints.

[L1]

Homotopy rel $A$ is reflexive and symmetric (Homotopy relative to a subspace is reflexive and symmetric).

[L2]

Homotopy rel $A$ is transitive by the two-piece reparametrisation construction (Two homotopies relative to the same subspace concatenate after piecewise-linear reparametrisation).

[L3]

A relation is an equivalence relation exactly when it is reflexive, symmetric and transitive (Equivalence relation, equivalence class, and the quotient set $A / \sim$ ).

Proof

technique · direct

1.1L1L2L3

By [L1] and [L2], $≃_{A}$ is reflexive, symmetric and transitive, so it is an equivalence relation by [L3]. Taking $A = \emptyset$ gives ordinary homotopy.

2.1step 1.1given∎

Paths from $y_{0}$ to $y_{1}$ are continuous maps $I \to Y$ with one prescribed restriction to the subspace ${0, 1}$ , and their path homotopies are exactly homotopies rel ${0, 1}$ . Hence step 1.1 applies to them.

Homotopy relative to a fixed subspace, and path homotopy relative to endpoints, are equivalence relations

Statement

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

Depends on

Dependency tree · 2 levels

Sources