How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Passing to the reduced quotient does not change the prime spectrum
Statement
Let be a commutative ring, let , and let be the quotient map. Then contraction along induces an inclusion-preserving bijection . If and , this bijection identifies with .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A commutative ring , its nilradical , and the quotient map .
Prime ideals of a quotient correspond exactly to prime ideals of the original ring containing the kernel (Prime ideals of a quotient ring are exactly the prime ideals containing the ideal).
Every element of is nilpotent (The nilradical and reduced rings).
Proof
Let . If , then for some , so . Because is prime, this forces . Thus every prime ideal of contains .
Applying [L1] to the quotient map and using step 1.1, one gets an inclusion-preserving bijection from onto all of . Moreover, for an ideal with pullback , a prime of contains exactly when its contraction contains . So the same bijection carries onto .
Therefore passing from to its reduced quotient does not change the prime spectrum or the vanishing sets attached to quotient ideals.