How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Relative Hahn–Banach makes the canonical bidual map an isometry
Statement
Assume HB. For every real or complex normed space , the canonical scalar-linear map , given by , satisfies It preserves distances and is injective. Surjectivity is not claimed.
Facts & Assumptions
Under HB, each nonzero has a functional with and (Relative dual norming, point separation, and recovery of the norm).
Evaluation defines a scalar-linear with (Evaluation defines a bounded scalar-linear map into the bidual).
Proof
Given: HB, a normed real or complex space , and the evaluation map .
By the evaluation construction, is scalar-linear and for every . In particular and equality of the norms holds at zero.
For , HB norming gives with and . The bidual norm is the supremum over the dual unit ball, which contains this , so . Combining with step 1.1 proves equality at every .
For , linearity and the established equality give . If , the left side is zero, so definiteness of the norm gives .
Source notes
Brezis §1.3, pp.8–9, first displayed isometry calculation; Teschl Theorem 4.20, pp.115–116.